RE: RE: RE: Al Goes Wacky

2001-01-25 Thread Lisa & Ian Murray
. . . jibe with M & B's latest S of WA? If not where's AG getting his data from? [sorry, haven't got my copy of it yet] mbs: Where are saying there is a contradiction? Remember, taxable income is a much narrower category than anything in GDP. *** I can't make out your fir

Re: RE: Re: Al Goes Wacky

2001-01-26 Thread Peter Dorman
A propos, everyone should get their hands on the New York Times article yesterday on Monsanto and the regulation of GM foods. It provides a useful perspective on who calls the shots, and who benefits from (at least this) regulation. Peter Lisa & Ian Murray wrote: > > And he is really, really s

Re: RE: Re: Al Goes Wacky

2001-01-27 Thread Jeffrey L. Beatty
At 03:57 PM 1/26/01 -0500, Charles Brown wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/26/01 12:40PM >>> > >> >> He's a Randite. He's always been a Randite. Conditional on the >> government's size being fixed, he's in favor of budget surpluses. But >> give him an opening where he thinks there's an oppor