Close but not quite the Absolute mind you :)
Cheers, Ken Hanly.
- Original Message -
From: Ian Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2001 3:23 PM
Subject: [PEN-L:15674] Re: RE: Genoa and Beyond II: The View from the Black
Bloc
>
> . . .
> What are the members of the mainstream cult afraid of? What are YOU
afraid
> of? What am I afraid of? The G8? The WTO? The IMF? Globalization?
The cops?
> The Black Bloc? The Almighty Dollar? The Apocalypse?
> nope
> Tom Walker
>
>
> you'll have to bring this down from poetry
> to pro
. . .
What are the members of the mainstream cult afraid of? What are YOU afraid
of? What am I afraid of? The G8? The WTO? The IMF? Globalization? The cops?
The Black Bloc? The Almighty Dollar? The Apocalypse?
nope
Tom Walker
you'll have to bring this down from poetry
to prose for the more dense
> The broken window fable is part and parcel of the
luddism/lump-of-labour
> refrain. It is the bulwark defence of the mainstream cult. It is a
clever
> concoction of half-truths, straw men and abstract theorizing posing
as
> empirical fact.
So is the lump-of-labor the Absolute?
Ian
> If we eliminated lawyers, what would aggressive, argumentative, anal,
> overeducated liberal arts types do?
I find a well-balanced mailing-list subscription regime answers tolerably well ...
Cheers,
Rob.
Tom Walker writes:
<<>>
I agree entirely.
Well, not entirely. The conservative side of me agrees with you. But the
libertarian side of me believes that any proposed cure would be worse than
the disease.
If we eliminated lawyers, what would aggressive, argumentative, anal,
overeducated libera
> Well, not entirely. The conservative side of me agrees with you.
But the
> libertarian side of me believes that any proposed cure would be
worse than
> the disease.
>
> If we eliminated lawyers, what would aggressive, argumentative,
anal,
> overeducated liberal arts types do?
>
> David Shemano
