RE: Re: Marx's method

The truly digmatic would discern the macro foundations of micro. mbs Does the "digmatic" AM dig Micro while neglecting Macro? Yoshie >Curiously appropriate for AMs. I rather like it. Of course, >"dogmatic" is bad, but "digmatic" may be good. --jks

RE: Re: Re: Re: re: Marx's method

Bah. Electronic instruments. PR nerds. Here's my contribution to the Lexicon: Proposed Main Entry: dig·mat·ic Pronunciation: dig-'ma-tik Variant(s): also dig·mat·i·cal /-ti-k&l/ Function: adjective Date: 2001 1 : revealing hidden meaning 2 : characterized by or given to the use of digmatism sy

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: re: Marx's method

1:22 PM Subject: [PEN-L:14704] Re: Re: Re: Re: re: Marx's method > can't one buy a digimatic from Ronco, the people who brought us the > Vegematic and the Bassamatic? > > >>Digmatic Electronic Caliper: 6",150mm. Made in Japan by Mitutoyo. Stainless > >>s

Re: Re: Re: Re: re: Marx's method

can't one buy a digimatic from Ronco, the people who brought us the Vegematic and the Bassamatic? >>Digmatic Electronic Caliper: 6",150mm. Made in Japan by Mitutoyo. Stainless >>steel. Comfortable, smooth and easy to use. The Mitutoyo digmatic is our top >>quality electronic caliper. Measures in

Re: Re: Re: re: Marx's method

Curiously appropriate for AMs. I rather like it. Of course, "dogmatic" is bad, but "digmatic" may be good. --jks >From: "Ann Li" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: [PEN-L:14701] Re: Re: r

Re: Re: re: Marx's method

Digmatic Electronic Caliper: 6",150mm. Made in Japan by Mitutoyo. Stainless steel. Comfortable, smooth and easy to use. The Mitutoyo digmatic is our top quality electronic caliper. Measures inside and outside in inches and millimeters. Goes from inches to millimeters at a touch of a button Large

Re: RE: Re: re: Marx's method

Max Sawicky wrote: >'digmatic'? If this isn't a word, >if should be, though I'm not sure >what it should mean.

Re: Re: Re: re: Marx's method

Can't talk about it now. Justice delayed is justice denied. Besides, the judge wants me to move this stuff off my desk. --jks >From: Jim Devine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: [PEN-L:14697] Re: Re: re: Marx's metho

RE: Re: re: Marx's method

'digmatic'? If this isn't a word, if should be, though I'm not sure what it should mean. mbs Do you think that _I_ am a reductionist of the bad sort? Although it's hardly worth arguing anymore, I have argued here and elsewhere that AM is not exhausted by Roemer's and Elster's more digmatic p

Re: Re: re: Marx's method

At 06:43 PM 7/5/01 +, you wrote: >Do you think that _I_ am a reductionist of the bad sort? no. I wasn't talking about you. What is Daniel Little's take on the issue, i.e., Marx's method? at a minimum, it seems that he could learn a lot from Ollman, or from Melvin Rader's _Marx's Interpret

Re: re: Marx's method

Do you think that _I_ am a reductionist of the bad sort? Although it's hardly worth arguing anymore, I have argued here and elsewhere that AM is not exhausted by Roemer's and Elster's more digmatic pronouncements on method, which are just as empty as Ollman's, as as little connected with what