>
>Yes I do object. With regard to reserach, neither I nor anyone here wants
>to be told what to work on. Now, there is some democratization possible in
>the decision to fund kinds of projects. The legislature can (and does)
>decide to alot a certain amount of funds to, say, cancer research. O
>
>In a message dated 7/29/02 1:49:29 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> >
> > Of course, in politics, the main body of "experts"
> > >is the revolutionary party guiding society.
> > >
> >
> >
> > Gaak. That is exactly where there and can be no expertise, just
>politic
- Original Message -
From: "Justin Schwartz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> if so, is
> >that form of truth meaningful in a general context?
>
> What does that mean? There is one one form of truth, which is, as
Aristotle
> said long ago, to say of that which is, that it is,a nd that which
is
>
>if i may say something as the resident slow thinker: things are
>whizzing by at a good speed on this thread but it seems to me
>that certain things are not clear (at least to me!). the examples
>and analysis (offered by michael p. and others) seems to touch
>upon the dangers of letting experts
Title: RE: [PEN-L:28811] Re: RE: Re: RE: Expertise
> "Could you please describe in plain English the curtailment
> of my liberties?"
>
> Ian
you have the right to remain silent...
Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine
- Original Message -
From: "Justin Schwartz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 2:52 PM
Subject: [PEN-L:28819] Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: Expertise
>
>"Could you please describe in plain English the curtailment of my
>
>
>"Could you please describe in plain English the curtailment of my
>liberties?"
>
>Ian
The judge asked him what time it was
Reuben said, Five to ten,
The Judge said, That's exactly what you get
--Hurricane (Bob Dylan)
Or as we say in Shytown, you all fucked, cuz.
jks
_
that expertise is sometimes nothing more than the artificial creation of
hierarchy.
On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 05:41:18PM +, Justin Schwartz wrote:
>
> : Expertise
> >Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 10:29:06 -0700
> >
> >Writing about expertise, I think that we should recall how Alfred Marshall
> >revam
: Expertise
>Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 10:29:06 -0700
>
>Writing about expertise, I think that we should recall how Alfred Marshall
>revamped econ. education -- making it more mathematical, even though he
>himself rejected the idea that math was useful for economics -- just to
>make it more difficul
His problem wasn't bad advice. The problem of many other people was that
they trusted his expertise.
On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 02:26:06PM +, Justin Schwartz wrote:
>
>
> >
> >Of course, there is expertise, but experts can be very wrong -- especially
> >if they go unchallenged. Ask Ken Lay.
>
>Of course, there is expertise, but experts can be very wrong -- especially
>if they go unchallenged. Ask Ken Lay.
>
His problem wasn't bad expert advice. It was sheer crookedness. Of course
there is bad expert advice. You wanna see my stock portfolio? It's a
testament to bad expert advice
11 matches
Mail list logo
