Title: RE: [PEN-L:33822] Re: RE: Re: the pen-l fairness doctrine
> Yoshie writes:
> For starters, avoid using such ungainly words as "incentivize"
> straight out of the book of CorporateSpeak.
I wrote:> right. In addition, I'm afraid the word "incentive" is inextricably bound with individual
joanna bujes wrote:
>
> At 04:15 PM 01/13/2003 -0600, you wrote:
> >Pissed at whom? A) At a government that is merely handmaiden to those
> >with real power? B) At a few corporate criminals who got caught with
> >their hands in the cookie jar? C) Or at the entire structure of greed
> >which r
Ian Murray wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Bill Lear" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > I don't agree. I am working with a religious group of peace activists
> > who have been amazed at the things I tell them about how our political
> > process works and who are hungry for more inform
Ian Murray wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> >
> The "one" speaker "enlightening a passive audience is a horrible method
> for organizing. One need only think of all those citizens sitting in
> church pews to realize this. It's not the content alone, but the form of
> communicating that
Ian is correct. If I can "make" a student turn left after a single class,
the next instructor can probably undo what "good" I have done. Follow up
is essential. Only after people become actively engaged is the "good"
effect likely to take hold.
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 01:43:05PM -0800, Ian Murr
At 12:59 PM 01/13/2003 -0800, you wrote:
Ha! I saw a bumper sticker the other day that read, "Religion is what
keeps the poor from killing the rich."
Oh, I thought it was low self-esteem that did it.
Joanna
"How can I accept a doctrine which sets up as its bibleĀan obsolete
economic textbook which I know to be not only scientifically
erroneous but without interest or application for the modern world?
How can I adopt a creed which, preferring the mud to the fish,
exalts the boorish proletariat abo
