RE: RE: RE: precautionary principle

2002-01-28 Thread Davies, Daniel
>I don't know very much about accounting, but what I was thinking of is as >follows: there's a big issue of how "one time charges" are counted in >reporting earnings. Are they discounted (minimized) the way Enron did and >other high-flyers do? or are they simply subtracted from current earnings? A

Re: RE: Re: RE: precautionary principle

2002-01-25 Thread Peter Dorman
Thanks! Could you post some specific references for Ravetz and Funtowicz? I agree with a lot (I think most) of the specifics you raise, but such a diffuse critique runs the risk of not communicating itself beyond the small circle of people who go through the whole thing systematically. Is there

Re: RE: Re: RE: precautionary principle

2002-01-25 Thread Ian Murray
- Original Message - From: "Forstater, Mathew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Once when I was giving a job talk for a position that was a joint appt in economics and environmental studies, after a long day of individual and group interviews with faculty and students of both programs, after going t

RE: Re: RE: precautionary principle

2002-01-25 Thread Forstater, Mathew
Hi Peter - I have taken a multi-pronged approach that includes arguments about valuation problems (criticisms of contingent valuation, travel cost, and other methods); an alternative view of social costs based on Kapp's work that includes cumulative causation; critique of "optimality" notions bas