PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jim Devine
Sent: 30 June 2000 03:36
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PEN-L:21003] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [Fwd: Position in the
World-System and National Emissions of]
At 01:49 AM 06/30/2000 +0100, you wrote:
Yelling at people that they are atavists, apocalyptics etc,
doesn't
-L:21031] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [Fwd: Position in the
World-System and National Emissions of]
Louis Proyect wrote:
Doug:
Does the revo also mean there won't be modern transportation,
chemical fertilizers, mechnized plowing and reaping, etc.? Then
there's truly no way to sustain a world
]
Subject: [PEN-L:21031] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [Fwd: Position in the
World-System and National Emissions of]
Louis Proyect wrote:
Doug:
Does the revo also mean there won't be modern transportation,
chemical fertilizers, mechnized plowing and reaping, etc.? Then
there's truly no way
:[PEN-L:21062] Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [Fwd:
Position in the
World-System and National Emissions of]
Perhaps Louis could explain what he means by small farms being more productive.
Even if it is true of some small farms producing some items I am not sure what
its
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2000 11:32 PM
Subject: [PEN-L:20981] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [Fwd: Position in the
World-System and National Emissions of] (fwd)
sustainable than the U.S. But is a growth rate of 0 low enough? Could
we feed and house 6 billion people if we all spent our time
