> "michael" == Michael Pugliese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
michael>And some start out progressive and move rightward. The
michael>Pentacostals in
michael> the 20's had integrated congregrations, and starting in the
michael> 30's divided into white and black denominations.
I
And some start out progressive and move rightward. The Pentacostals in
the 20's had integrated congregrations, and starting in the 30's divided
into white and black denominations.
For an examination, more generally on right-wing Protestantism, see David
Stoll, "Is Latin America Turning Prote
At a "dumb" terinal , no windows so can't cut and paste the
excerpt on the web.) The book published originally by the Italian
leftist publisher, G. Feltrinelli, by Vittorio Lanternari, "Religions
of the Oppressed, " from the early 60's, is a useful text. Go
to Google type in 'religions of the
Greetings Economists,
Ann Li remarks and queries me,
Ann Li,
Doyle, Having read your prior post on the joint attention issue, I'd like to
hear a bit more on how your knowledge production interests include network
formation of "ideology" as well as perhaps Roemerian exploitation. I say
this onl
are there
echoes of Charles Wolff or Carchetti's earlier work on mental labor in your
research?
Ann
- Original Message -
From: "Doyle Saylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 9:27 PM
Subject: [PEN-L:13023] Re: Re:
Greetings Economists,
Michael Perelman writes,
Michael,
I agree with Anthony. This thread is not going anywhere.
Doyle
I differ here with this opinion. There is considerable analysis to be made
about what is religion in terms of IT production, human and primate
evolution, and especially in reg
In a message dated 6/8/2001 2:43:33 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I agree with Anthony. This thread is not going anywhere
A final comment. If this thread is going nowhere, then let it stop. But then
please do not associate me or my work with New Ageism, even if I mention
ednesday, June 06, 2001 11:35 AM
> Subject: [PEN-L:12878] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: the gospel of buddha
>
>
> > At 09:32 AM 6/6/01 -0700, you wrote:
> > >We've got
> > >non-alcohol beer, non-fat milk, and non-God religion,
> > >otherwise kno
secular
humanism...
Cheers, Ken Hanly
- Original Message -
From: Jim Devine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 11:35 AM
Subject: [PEN-L:12878] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: the gospel of buddha
> At 09:32 AM 6/6/01 -0700, you wrot
xx
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Carrol Cox wrote:
> Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2001 10:04:05 -0500
> From: Carrol Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [PEN-L:12865] Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: the gospel of buddha
>
>
>
> Anthony D
At 09:32 AM 6/6/01 -0700, you wrote:
>We've got
>non-alcohol beer, non-fat milk, and non-God religion,
>otherwise known as the Unitarians. The Unitarians
>appararently can't give up the structure of the
>church.
as an excommunicated Unitarian and as a current goyisher participant in a
secular Je
I'm not sure how things work in SoCal, but up north
here "spirituality" is sorta religion-lite. We've got
non-alcohol beer, non-fat milk, and non-God religion,
otherwise known as the Unitarians. The Unitarians
appararently can't give up the structure of the
church.
Further out, there's lots of p
At 10:04 AM 6/6/01 -0500, you wrote:
> >
> > May be I wasn't clear enough: there is one thing as organized religion and
> > then there is spirituality. I meant the
>
>Spirituality, not organized religion, is the evil. The left (when we get
>a left) must _of course_ include all religious leftists,
At 12:54 AM 6/7/01 +, you wrote:
>G'day Jim,
>
> >I'm afraid there are some important issues -- such as the implications of
>one's own death -- that can't be dealt with in a rational or empirical way.<
>
>You stop. And then they incinerate your carcass whilst Billy Bragg's
>Internationale pla
Anthony D'Costa wrote:
>
> May be I wasn't clear enough: there is one thing as organized religion and
> then there is spirituality. I meant the
Spirituality, not organized religion, is the evil. The left (when we get
a left) must _of course_ include all religious leftists, even among the
lea
G'day Jim,
>I'm afraid there are some important issues -- such as the implications of
one's own death -- that can't be dealt with in a rational or empirical way.<
You stop. And then they incinerate your carcass whilst Billy Bragg's
Internationale plays in the chapel. And then the bereaved get
001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 19:15:33 EDT
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [PEN-L:12817] Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: the gospel of buddha
>
> In a message dated 6/5/2001 6:50:36 PM Eastern Daylight Ti
In a message dated 6/5/2001 6:50:36 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Anthony DCosta wrote:
> Who is a "good buddha"?
>
no, no, not "a" good buddha. "the" good buddha, as in the main man
himself, siddharth, gautama, you know, the dude with the piled-on-
top-in-a-bun hairdo
In a message dated 6/5/2001 6:50:36 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
no, no, not "a" good buddha. "the" good buddha, as in the main man
himself, siddharth, gautama, you know, the dude with the piled-on-
top-in-a-bun hairdo and the funky toga robe thingummy, who turned
to exist
19 matches
Mail list logo
