On 02/6/26 04:35 AM, "Michael Perelman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jim, if you are suggesting that the Amtrack subsidy should go to United
> Airlines, I suspect that you will get a friendly hearing from W.
>
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 12:06:17PM -0700, Devine, James wrote:
>> If the U.S. govern
Title: RE: [PEN-L:27195] Re: RE: Re: transportation
Hey! I could pay off all my bills and live the life of ease... But every time I've tried to sell out in the past, no-one would buy.
;-)
Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine
> -Orig
Yes, I realized that, but I was thinking if you changed your
recommendation slightly, you would probably find a good reception in
Washington.
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 12:38:20PM -0700, Devine, James wrote:
> no I wasn't. I was saying if UAL deserves a sop, why not Amtrak.
>
> Jim Devine [EMAIL PR
Title: RE: [PEN-L:27191] Re: transportation
no I wasn't. I was saying if UAL deserves a sop, why not Amtrak.
Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Perelman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 12
