[comments?}
Sala-i-Martin is a good lad; he's a Catalonian Nationalist and thus familiar
to me from my short Welsh Nash period as a writer of tracts on the economic
viability of small European nations. But the obvious point is that this is
a piece of doublespeak from the Economist; the trick
From: Davies, Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PEN-L:28988] RE: convergence?
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 08:40:41 +0100
[comments?}
Sala-i-Martin is a good lad; he's a Catalonian Nationalist and thus
familiar
to me from my
Title: RE: [PEN-L:29002] Re: RE: convergence?
Also, with these time series studies, we should adjust any numbers for the disappearance of non-market sources of livelihood, a process that is part and parcel of marketization. This hits those with the smallest incomes most.
Jim Devine [EMAIL
At 02:34 PM 07/31/2002 -0700, you wrote:
[comments?]
THE ECONOMIST / July 20, 2002
Convergence, period
The Economist is the most loathsome economic periodical I have ever read.
It is such a mass of confusion, legerdemain, prevarication, and
obfuscation that I do not think it is worth
From: Devine, James [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pen-l (E-mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PEN-L:28969] convergence?
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 14:34:29 -0700
[comments?]
THE ECONOMIST / July 20, 2002
Convergence, period
MOST people who have a view on the
Wojtek Sokolowski wrote:
The jobless growth seems to be a new reality
Where? Not in the U.S., certainly. Certainly not in East Asia. Western
Europe has no growth, so it doesn't count. Ditto a lot of the former
socialist world. Where is this jobless growth happening? I'm desperate to
know.
