Please Andrew, we have better ways of using our time. This seems to be
the thread that you started on the Marxism list.
I have never said anywhere that we should kill large numbers of innocent
Afghans. Elsewhere I have said I am categorically opposed to the US going to
war with
Michael Perelman wrote:
Please Andrew, we have better ways of using our time.
In other words, no political debate, please, we're economists?
I don't get what your standards are, Michael. More transparency, please!
Doug
I agree with Doug. Michael, you seem to be rejecting any discussion that's
unpleasant.
At 10:10 AM 10/03/2001 -0400, you wrote:
Michael Perelman wrote:
Please Andrew, we have better ways of using our time.
In other words, no political debate, please, we're economists?
I don't get what your
Both Jim and Doug disapproved of my handling of Andrew's post. My
response reflected the way I saw Andrew's thread evolve on the Marxism
list. If you think that it can lead to a fruitful discussion, then go
ahead. I remain skeptical
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State
I foresee at some point a man with a white piece of paper in his hand
stating, I have here the names of dozens of known Bin Laden supporters
in the White House.
Steve
On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Michael Perelman wrote:
I concur with Jim. We have no need to discuss the bin Laden here,
I have already been hearing resports of intrusive FBI investigations of
people who have had no possible connection with the bombing -- for
instance, a SF branch of the peace group, Women in Black.
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 05:42:20PM -1000, Stephen E Philion wrote:
I foresee at some point a man
