Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: GT (fwd)

2000-06-21 Thread Stephen E Philion
The thing about you Mine, is you are just so SMART! Steve On Wed, 21 Jun 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Sometimes, it is interesting to follow the "orientation" of discussion > taking place in this list. The intellectual ranks of _Analytical Marxism_ > include people like Cohen,

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: GT (fwd)

2000-06-21 Thread Rod Hay
Marx in volume II shows that capitalist equilibrium with growth is possible, but that it is unlikely because of the co-ordination problems between the sectors of the economy. Arrow and Debreu using neo-classical modeling techniques show something similar. That static equilibrium is possible. But

Re: Re: Re: Re: GT (fwd)

2000-06-21 Thread md7148
Sometimes, it is interesting to follow the "orientation" of discussion taking place in this list. The intellectual ranks of _Analytical Marxism_ include people like Cohen, Elster, Przeworski, Roemer and Olin Wright. It is increasingly becoming hard for me to understand how one criticizes Cohen's

Re: Re: Re: Re: GT (fwd)

2000-06-21 Thread Jim Devine
At 07:57 PM 06/21/2000 -0400, you wrote: >see Daniel Little, the Scientific Marx, who explains how Marx's analysis >in Capital depends on many rational choice presuppositions. It's not >surprising, since he was analysing a market systrem where those >presuppositions are more valid than not. I