You and CArroll responnd to sharp criticism with accusations of Red-baiting,
and then have the chutzpah to reproach me for ad hominem attacks. Of course
Marx was nota n orthodix Marxist. He was, as he said when he encountered the
phenonomenon of orthodox Marxism, not a Marxist at all. He welcom
Carrol Cox wrote:
>No
>Stalinist was ever so dependent on jargon of any sort as are
>red-baiters on the myth of orthodox marxism to red-baiting.
That's really funny. You mean offbeat Marxists like Adorno or
Lefebvre wrote more jargon-ridden prose than your average
pronunciamento of the CPSU? E
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hey, Carrol, orthodox Marxism is a myth? I wish. --jks
It is a myth absolutely necessary for the health of red-baiting. No
Stalinist was ever so dependent on jargon of any sort as are
red-baiters on the myth of orthodox marxism to red-baiting.
The use of the term is
In a message dated 6/22/00 11:28:28 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< The Subjection of Women_; _On Liberty_; and _Representative
Government_ still stand up pretty well. The "Essay on Bentham" is a
sensitive positive critique of utilitarianism.
And it seems to me like
I wrote:
>>and many people say that Harriet T. likely wrote _The Subjection of
>>Women_ but thought that she couldn't get it published under her name.
Brad queries:
>I hadn't known that. Sources? Now I'm curious enough that I'll spend the
>morning re-reading it...
unfortunately, this is someth
>At 08:20 PM 6/21/00 -0700, you wrote:
>>>Marx's complain against J. S. Mill was that he was mediocre, and looked good
>>>simply because the competition was so dreadful. Mediocre because he confined
>>>himself to study surface phenomena, rather than to look at the real motor of
>>>history.
>>>
>>>
She spent her weekends with her husband and JSM. I recall that she often could
not walk, except when it was time for their vacation in France -- but I could be
mistaken on that.
Brad De Long wrote:
> >Marx's complain against J. S. Mill was that he was mediocre, and looked good
> >simply because
At 08:20 PM 6/21/00 -0700, you wrote:
>>Marx's complain against J. S. Mill was that he was mediocre, and looked good
>>simply because the competition was so dreadful. Mediocre because he confined
>>himself to study surface phenomena, rather than to look at the real motor of
>>history.
>>
>>Rod
>
>
