Steve, please stop "grading" other people's posts. Write the person off
list if you want.
On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 12:26:43AM +0100, Chris Burford wrote:
> At 03/06/01 20:56 -1000, you wrote:
> >On Sun, 3 Jun 2001, Chris Burford wrote:
> > > I wonder now what contemptuous humorous joke Louis Proy
At 03/06/01 20:56 -1000, you wrote:
>On Sun, 3 Jun 2001, Chris Burford wrote:
> > I wonder now what contemptuous humorous joke Louis Proyect was trying to
> > stifle when I first enquired whether there had been any discussion of
> > sheep. If it was anything more than political analysis by sectar
At 04/06/01 09:41 +0100, Mark Jones wrote:
Chris Burford wrote:
> In my earlier post entitled 'A People's History of England' I
> gave detailed
> evidence of why orthodox marxist views on England in the past
gave
> prominence to the role of sheep and wool in the emergence of
> capitalism in
> Eng
Chris Burford wrote:
> In my earlier post entitled 'A People's History of England' I
> gave detailed
> evidence of why orthodox marxist views on England in the past gave
> prominence to the role of sheep and wool in the emergence of
> capitalism in
> England,
Morton's classic work does show how
On Sun, 3 Jun 2001, Chris Burford wrote:
> I wonder now what contemptuous humorous joke Louis Proyect was trying to
> stifle when I first enquired whether there had been any discussion of
> sheep. If it was anything more than political analysis by sectarian
> mockery, perhaps he can reveal it. Ot
Michael Perelman:
>
>
> Actually, Mark privately criticized me for that part of the book.
I said the following about the book on the CrashList:
> The importance of "The Invention of Capitalism" cannot be underestimated.
> The history of so-called "Primitive Accumulation" is still not just
> litt
Actually, Mark privately criticized me for that part of the book. I
mostly agreed with him, but I did not have time to take advantage of his
comments. Still, on the whole, there were stong similarities between the
two.
I did not look at much of the international contribution because I was
tryi
>When was this? Arguably, England was not backward in terms of political
>development, from before the Norman Conquest. No European state was as
>mature as Edward the Confessor's. And when was the following? Arguably,
>there were always labour shortages in England, except for brief periods in
>the
I believed that at the time when England was exporting raw wool, it was
fairly backward economcally; that the European city states were ahead.
On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 12:41:14AM +0100, Mark Jones wrote:
> Michael Perelman:
> >
> >
> > I agree with much of Mark's note, except for the way he dismis
2 June 2001 08:13
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [PEN-L:12610] RE: Re: Sheep and the rise of capitalism in
> England
>
Chris Burford wrote:
> Although Wood's book "A Trumpet of Sedition" (with Neal Wood) is
> subtitled
> 'Political Theory and the Rise o
Chris Burford wrote:
> Although Wood's book "A Trumpet of Sedition" (with Neal Wood) is
> subtitled
> 'Political Theory and the Rise of Capitalism 1509-1688', the following
> passage shows that the issue of wool is important to her
> explanation of the
> basis of the rise of English capitalism p
At 01/06/01 11:50 -1000, you wrote:
>I have never been a big fan of British sheep. They make me wanna sleep.
>
>Steve
You seem not be be energised by the evidence that Ellen Wood is guilty of a
propagating a non-proletarian analysis of history.
Besides why do you confuse English sheep with Br
I have never been a big fan of British sheep. They make me wanna sleep.
Steve
On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Chris Burford wrote:
> At 02/06/01 01:01 +, you wrote:
> >Chris Burford wrote:
> > >
> > > It seems clear that Louis Proyect has nothing to say himself on the
> > > role of sheep in the rise
13 matches
Mail list logo
