Re: Speaking of volatility (Jones)

2001-07-15 Thread Tom Walker
I appreciate very much what Doyle had to say about the listserv not functioning as a place for collaborative work. That gets closer to my point than what I actually said. In the past, I've made connections through Pen-l that have led to two major pieces of collaborative work and several other st

Re: Speaking of volatility (Jones)

2001-07-14 Thread Yoshie Furuhashi
Doyle writes: >Greetings Economists, > >Tom Walker writes, >>What strikes me is that Doug, Michael, Yoshie and Mark offered no response >>to my _programmatic_ reply to Doug. I could be utterly wrong, in which case >>I would welcome the criticism. But I don't think I'm vague or obtuse. Doug >>wrot

Re: Re: Speaking of volatility (Jones)

2001-07-14 Thread Doyle Saylor
Greetings Economists, Tom Walker writes, Tom What strikes me is that Doug, Michael, Yoshie and Mark offered no response to my _programmatic_ reply to Doug. I could be utterly wrong, in which case I would welcome the criticism. But I don't think I'm vague or obtuse. Doug wrote (in a subsequent

Re: Speaking of volatility (Jones)

2001-07-14 Thread Yoshie Furuhashi
>I regret that Mark has piggy-backed blue-baiting of on top of my >chiding. I share a number of Doug's cultural criticisms of "the >left". I don't think that makes me a Republican. My issue with Doug >is that he makes his dour observations and then "leaves it at that." >The implication of the

Re: Speaking of volatility (Jones)

2001-07-14 Thread Tom Walker
I regret that Mark has piggy-backed blue-baiting of on top of my chiding. I share a number of Doug's cultural criticisms of "the left". I don't think that makes me a Republican. My issue with Doug is that he makes his dour observations and then "leaves it at that." The implication of the result