Re: The New Economy Goes Bust

2001-12-11 Thread Michael Perelman
The one number that stands out is Hungary at 1.0, cheaper than Indonesia. Way cheaper than Poland. Rob Schaap wrote: > Table of international business operating costs > LONDON, Dec 11 AAP|Published: Tuesday December 11, 10:33 PM > > http://www.theage.com.au/breaking/2001/12/11/FFX674JKCQC.html

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The New Economy Goes Bust

2001-12-09 Thread Michael Perelman
Isn't the Gap on of the most intransigent sweatshop-dependent companies, relying on Chinese workers that go to Guam on false pretenses and who then live in barracks? -- Michael Perelman Economics Department California State University Chico, CA 95929 Tel. 530-898-5321 E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Re: Re: Re: The New Economy Goes Bust

2001-12-09 Thread Carl Remick
>From: Rakesh Bhandari > >>the changing nature of work, > >Doug, have you had a chance to read Frederick Abernathy, John Dunlop, >Janice Hammond and David Weil, A Stitch in Time: Lean Retailing and the >transformation of mfg --lessons from the apparel and textile industries >(oxford, 1999)? Hav

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The New Economy Goes Bust

2001-12-09 Thread ALI KADRI
Why are the average growth calculations from peak to peak, ie 1989 to 2000. these are base year sensitive, but maybe he has something else in mind. --- Michael Perelman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > the World Trade attack greatly reduced the > attractiveness of Just-In-Time > inventory reduction.

Re: Re: Re: Re: The New Economy Goes Bust

2001-12-08 Thread Michael Perelman
the World Trade attack greatly reduced the attractiveness of Just-In-Time inventory reduction. But then business may have forgotten about it now that the emergency has passed. On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 06:43:21PM -0800, Rakesh Bhandari wrote: > > the changing nature of work...and the ideology o

Re: Re: Re: The New Economy Goes Bust

2001-12-08 Thread Rakesh Bhandari
> the changing nature of work...and the ideology of the New Economy >(which I read as an exuberant variant on post-industrialism, a >doctrine that's been ripening for at least 30 years). Doug, any explicit discussion of this book: Technology and Capital in the Age of Lean Production : A Marxi

Re: Re: Re: The New Economy Goes Bust

2001-12-08 Thread Rakesh Bhandari
> > the changing nature of work, Doug, have you had a chance to read Frederick Abernathy, John Dunlop, Janice Hammond and David Weil, A Stitch in Time: Lean Retailing and the transformation of mfg--lessons from the apparel and textile industries (oxford, 1999)? Haven't read it. It seems to be

Re: Re: The New Economy Goes Bust

2001-12-08 Thread Doug Henwood
Carl Remick wrote: >>From: Michael Perelman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >>Michael Meerpol said that penners might be interested in Dean Baker's >>The New Economy Goes Bust. I think that he is correct. >> >>http://www.cepr.net/new_economy_goes_bust.htm > >I notice the summary comment here, "Even the m

Re: The New Economy Goes Bust

2001-12-07 Thread Carl Remick
>From: Michael Perelman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Michael Meerpol said that penners might be interested in Dean Baker's >The New Economy Goes Bust. I think that he is correct. > >http://www.cepr.net/new_economy_goes_bust.htm I notice the summary comment here, "Even the most cursory review of the da