At 07:30 PM 09/29/2002 -0700, Charles wrote:
>I would bet you used phonics methods in beginning
>reading within a much larger approach to reading,
>which usually is, in a nutshell, to learn to read
>by reading so as to have lifelong reading to
>learn. That might include sight vocabulary/whole
>wor
I think this is the point. The interesting research issue for someone is to examine how and why phonics vs. whole language became a religious issue.
On Monday, September 30, 2002, at 09:47 AM, Devine, James wrote:
Anyway, my point is that phonics work for some students. The problem with public ed
Title: RE: [PEN-L:30697] Re: War Against Literacy=
I wrote:
> > The Bushite teach-to-the-test Bushwa is a disaster (as is the whole "Leave
> > No Child Behind" nonsense, which seems aimed at helping the private
> > schools), but here's a good word for
--- joanna bujes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hey Charles,
>
> I'm lost. I've taught three children to read
> using phonics...with
> outstanding results. Is the point that phonics
> is a bad method? Or that the
> tests are self serving?
>
> Joanna
>
I would bet you used phonics methods in be
Michael Perelman asked,
>Neil Bush is also involved in the testing business. Is that an omen of
>impending collapse?
Silverado Neil has a company that produces web-based multi-media
instructional support material. That no doubt fits under the supplemental
services component of No Child Left Beh
Hey Charles,
I'm lost. I've taught three children to read using phonics...with
outstanding results. Is the point that phonics is a bad method? Or that the
tests are self serving?
Joanna
--- Michael Perelman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I cannot speak about educational matters in
> particular, but BW is probably the least
> ideological of business publication -- probably
> because they do not seem to be
> pitching to the rubes, but to business people
> who profit from information
I cannot speak about educational matters in particular, but BW is probably the least
ideological of business publication -- probably because they do not seem to be
pitching to the rubes, but to business people who profit from information.
Charles Jannuzi wrote:
> BW is a McGraw Hill mouthpiece o
Neil Bush is also involved in the testing business. Is that an omen of
impending collapse?
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I sort of wrote this up while engaged in
pro-Whole Language debate in support of people
like Krashen and Goodman (true heroes for
language and literacy education in the US).
It has since grown into a presentation at the
World Congress for Applied Linguistics in
Singapore this December (my other p
--- "Devine, James" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Bushite teach-to-the-test Bushwa is a
> disaster (as is the whole "Leave
> No Child Behind" nonsense, which seems aimed at
> helping the private
> schools), but here's a good word for phonics:
> different children have
> different "learning sty
Title: RE: [PEN-L:30692] War Against Literacy=
The Bushite teach-to-the-test Bushwa is a disaster (as is the whole "Leave No Child Behind" nonsense, which seems aimed at helping the private schools), but here's a good word for phonics: different children have different "learning styles,"
12 matches
Mail list logo
