On 02/6/26 04:35 AM, "Michael Perelman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jim, if you are suggesting that the Amtrack subsidy should go to United
> Airlines, I suspect that you will get a friendly hearing from W.
>
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 12:06:17PM -0700, Devine, James wrote:
>> If the U.S. govern
Title: RE: [PEN-L:27195] Re: RE: Re: transportation
Hey! I could pay off all my bills and live the life of ease... But every time I've tried to sell out in the past, no-one would buy.
;-)
Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine
> -Orig
Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Michael Perelman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 12:36 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [PEN-L:27191] Re: transportatio
Title: RE: [PEN-L:27191] Re: transportation
no I wasn't. I was saying if UAL deserves a sop, why not Amtrak.
Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Perelman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tues
Jim, if you are suggesting that the Amtrack subsidy should go to United
Airlines, I suspect that you will get a friendly hearing from W.
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 12:06:17PM -0700, Devine, James wrote:
> If the U.S. government is going to bail out United Airlines (as the airline
> wants), shouldn't
