Re: The Soviet Union and high technology: Correction

2003-11-17 Thread Renato Pompeu
Union and high technology: Correction Should read:Planning IS NOT a property relation and socialism as a political form of property, means reproduction outside of the law system that compels private capital to follow a circuit of profitability.

Re: The Soviet Union and high technology: Correction

2003-11-17 Thread Waistline2
>Planning as a property relation and socialism is a political form of property, means reproduction outside of the law system that compels private capital to follow a circuit of profitability.

Re: The Soviet Union and high technology

2003-11-17 Thread Waistline2
In a message dated 11/17/03 5:12:42 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes, presenting an article by comrade Mark Jones - 1997: >If these debates were utopian and based on misunderstandings of the real issues when they took place sixty years ago (or in Hilferding's time, or Bernstein's

The Soviet Union and high technology

2003-11-17 Thread Louis Proyect
(posted to marxmail by Jose Perez) >>I think that is probably correct. The Soviet Union was quite successful in negotiating the transition from an agrarian economy to an industrial one but they ran aground when they attempted to make the transition to an economy based on high technology.<< I don'