discovered the thread 'gospel of the buddhas' had started, with no input
wanted from the source. My views were being completely misrepresented. That
was unfair. I was nearly done again. And Michael simply cut me off.
The question of the eonic effect tends to create an initial harsh
>on ongoing threads, you keep going back to your theory which remains
>incomprehensible to me. Doing so takes up bandwith. Many people outside
>of the US pay be the amount of stuff that they get.
Exactly. Every time John posts, up comes the eonic effect. I'd like to hear his
t;
> > As a congenital incomprehensible myself, I have an instinctive sympathy and
> > patience for struggling incomprehensibles. I'm afraid to say, though, I
> > couldn't grok the eonic effect and I'm afraid it may be eons before I do.
> > Perhaps if you could
In a message dated 6/9/2001 11:36:19 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As a congenital incomprehensible myself, I have an instinctive sympathy and
patience for struggling incomprehensibles. I'm afraid to say, though, I
couldn't grok the eonic effect and I'm a
As a congenital incomprehensible myself, I have an instinctive sympathy and
patience for struggling incomprehensibles. I'm afraid to say, though, I
couldn't grok the eonic effect and I'm afraid it may be eons before I do.
Perhaps if you could just repeat yourself LOUDER, John, w
, it's all Peter Singer style sociobiology now. REally trashy stufff.
I guarantee you I will sink leftist Darwinism. The torpedo is in the water.
John Landon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Website on eonic effect
http://eonix.8m.com
http://www.eonica.net
n.
I hope you will be able to see the point of the argument, which is fairly
complex, but the basic structure is elegant and beautiful although Darwinists
prefer their hogswill history, like Darwin himself.
This 'eonic analysis' of the 'eonic effect' voids all claims of
sociobi
talism really were a determinate phase of
world history, how could it switch on or off. The statement is actually
incoherent, but the point is that we would need a macro system that, however
long range and sluggish, transcends mere economic momentum. And that is what
we have. Note this resembl
ree mayhem without guilt, and the rest of it. Time is up for these
tactics. And the entirely of twentieth century social science needs to be
rewritten free of the stinking bullshit that passes for hog trough scientism.
Unsubscribe me if you don't like it.
John Landon
author
World History and t
mysteries are of the unknown, new information. Others, like this 'eonic
effect', must be about what we already know. The reason is that, within
limits, we see history behind us, but fragments. But we already see the eonic
effect, up to a point, but we must realize what we are seeing.
Ha
One more 'chiller' to make Darwin fans weak kneed. Before looking at the
eonic effect you feel sure there is no going back, burn your bridges behind
you.
The following quotation is from my webpage and is a critique by John Campbell
of population genetics models that are often pres
herent. So
perhaps it is alternative coherence.
First, my quick analysis of the issue of capitalism gives you very little
idea of my thesis. You might explore my eonic effect a little further. The
post in question is too brief. The eonic effect is a lot more cogent than it
seems at first, an
agency, or free will, to historical change, mediated of course by circumstances, but it's not clear how this concern is maintained in your eonic conclusions.
How can we use the eonic effect to improve our daily lives? If it's another predetermination theory, then I guess we should stop tryin
eonic effect pattern, we see it is only a matter of time,
barring total mind control, which can't be ruled out, before
darwin-sociobiological and purely one-dimensional accounts of positivistic
history fail and crash. At that point Kant, like him or not, is useful for
disciplining the eq
everyone else to do
the same. Marxists, you see, are stuck with it. And I regret to say the net
result is a big zero.
Anyway, no Kant at all is required for my eonic effect. The point is to see
Kant rising in the generation just after Newton., and figuring, "Uh oh,
trouble coming". A
le unitary process. A law of cause, and a
law of freedom, say. That can't be a theory, in the scientific sense. For it
is a contradiction. But we can use it descriptively, and lo and behold that
is just what the evidence of history shows. A double action process. My eonic
effect.
In a message
al Message -
From: "Ricardo Duchesne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 8:47 AM
Subject: [PEN-L:11601] Book on the Eonic Effect: A Note German Ideology
> John,
>
> Glad you took what I said in the lighthearted manner intende
ood short history on Whigs and
> Tories as you work through the fossil record. Did Perelman download a
> copy yet?
>
>
> John Landon
> author
> World History and the Eonic Effect
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://eonix.8m.com
>
h the fossil record.
Did Perelman download a copy yet?
John Landon
author
World History and the Eonic Effect
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://eonix.8m.com
John:
The work was cited and summarized this year in
History and Theory. But no respectable journal will touch it. C'est la
vie.
---
Actually, mad dog, History and Theory is a highly respected journal.
Just had three smear reviews of World History and the Eonic Effect removed
from Amazon.com book siteThey hadn't even bothered to read the book. The
Darwin enforcers are busy, and you might be interested to see how they play
this game. Plus a firestorm attack counterattack on the Kant-l
21 matches
Mail list logo
