Re: [PEN-L] power/Michael's writings

2005-01-16 Thread Paul
Thanks for the help, I was looking for it incorrectly (and this is only one of many lacunae I have had in knowing valuable literature, so no one should think that means the work is not known). In fact, far from a secret book, actually I have now found it in a number of libraries, for sale, etc

Re: [PEN-L] power

2005-01-16 Thread michael perelman
Jim, how would you calculate the reproduction cost of a 2 year old computer, even in theory? Yes, you are correct that you can use the theory even without measurment. Devine, James wrote: Michael Perelman writes: ... we have no way of calculating the abstract labor values of already installed

[PEN-L] Panix attack

2005-01-16 Thread Louis Proyect
For the past 2 days I have not received any email because some scumbags hijacked the Panix domain and reregistered it. Service seems to be restored, but the Panix website still appears to be under the control of the hijackers. The other day there was an article in the Times about people getting

Re: [PEN-L] Berkeley on Power

2005-01-16 Thread Bill Lear
On Sunday, January 16, 2005 at 18:14:37 (-0800) michael perelman writes: As George Berkeley [Berkeley, George. [1735] 1970. The Querist. Reprinted in Bishop Berkeley's Querist in Historical Perspective, by Joesph Johnston (Dundalk, Ireland: Dundalgan Press): pp. 125, 127] would later point out,