Carrol wrote:
You expect too much of theory.
I grant that theory is not practice. However, leftist theory has
traditionally attempted to assist the practice of workers and other
underdogs. Job creation and job destruction are both important to workers.
Thus, if it is important for workers to
Jim wrote:
Marx's theory in CAPITAL (volume 1) is mostly about job destruction.
This focuses on a representative industry, i.e., one that represents
the abstract general laws of accumulation. But there are also
processes of job creation in Marx: if aggregate accumulation is fast
enough, that
IMHO, the difference that David misses is that between exchange-value
(and surplus-value) and use-value. Markets and capitalism serve the
lust for money revenues (exchange-value) and profits (surplus-value)
and not what's good for people (use-value). If you don't have the cash
up front, the
being a really old guy, I remember the golden days when people
nervously apologized for such shameless self-promotion because of the
still-ongoing effort to keep the web non-commercial. Of course,
nowadays almost all of the web is nothing but commercial and no-one
should even think of
From Monsters and Critics.com
Americas News
Castro ends 8-month silence to slam US ethanol plans (2nd Roundup)
By DPA
Mar 29, 2007, 19:59 GMT
Havana - Ending eight months of silence, ailing Cuban President Fidel
Castro published an article in Cuban state media Thursday criticizing
US
http://macroblog.typepad.com/macroblog/2007/03/foreclosures_an.html
Michael A. Lebowitz
Professor Emeritus
Economics Department
Simon Fraser University
Burnaby, B.C., Canada V5A 1S6
Currently based in Venezuela.
NOTE NEW PHONE NUMBERS
Can be reached at
Residencias Anauco Suites
Departamento 601
Michael Perelman,
are you currently cooling off, in this cooling-off period?
--
Jim Devine / Segui il tuo corso, e lascia dir le genti. (Go your own
way and let
people talk.) -- Karl, paraphrasing Dante.
ZNet | U.S.
Why George Bush is Insane
by Harold Pinter; March 30, 2007
Earlier this year I had a major operation for cancer. The
operation and its after-effects were something of a nightmare. I
felt I was a man unable to swim bobbing about under water in a
Marx was big on the innovative power of capitalism - both its
penchant for creating new technologies and new wants. It's not hard
to relate that to a theory of job creation, even though many Marxists
seem temperamentally inclined to emphasize destruction.
For a system of thought that
[RGS doesn't appear in the DSM-IV, but it refers to the fact that the
more medals a general has on his (or her) uniform, the worse the
general is in battle.]
from SLATE moneybox
Haunted Mansion
A study proves that the bigger his house, the worse the CEO.
By Daniel Gross
Posted Thursday, March
Doug Henwood wrote:
Marx was big on the innovative power of capitalism - both its
penchant for creating new technologies and new wants. It's not hard
to relate that to a theory of job creation, even though many Marxists
seem temperamentally inclined to emphasize destruction.
For a system of
From Juan Cole:
The US embassy in Baghdad circulated a memo to all Americans working
for the US government in the Green Zone. It ordered them to wear
protective gear whenever they were outside in the Green Zone,
including just moving from one building to another. Guerrillas have
managed to lob a
On 3/30/07, Doug Henwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marx was big on the innovative power of capitalism - both its
penchant for creating new technologies and new wants. It's not hard
to relate that to a theory of job creation, even though many Marxists
seem temperamentally inclined to emphasize
On Mar 30, 2007, at 12:58 PM, Michael Hoover wrote:
while you, doug, seem temperamentally inclined to emphasize
capitalism's progressive tendencies
Not really. I just have to do it on PEN-L because no one else will.
It's also a very destructive and alienating system.
Doug
I wrote about the Yermack paper a week or so ago. I did not know about the
Russian
generals.
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 09:31:57AM -0700, Jim Devine wrote:
[RGS doesn't appear in the DSM-IV, but it refers to the fact that the
more medals a general has on his (or her) uniform, the worse the
Louis Proyect wrote:
The real problem is disincentives to invest. What do you do when
there is no incentive to invest, such as was the case during the
1930s?
In these circumstances, the state moves to reflate the economy by
recapitalizing the banks and boosting mass purchasing power. The
On 3/30/07, Michael Perelman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wrote about the Yermack paper a week or so ago. I did not know about the
Russian
generals.
I think about the Russian generals whenever I remember that the
university's Academic Vice President was re-titled as the Chief
Academic Officer
On 3/30/07, Doug Henwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 30, 2007, at 12:58 PM, Michael Hoover wrote:
while you, doug, seem temperamentally inclined to emphasize
capitalism's progressive tendencies
Not really. I just have to do it on PEN-L because no one else will.
It's also a very
Marvin wrote:
Yes, which is a major reason why private investment has now come to be
regarded as a more possible means of generating growth than state
ownership, even by popular movements which came to power avowing the radical
redistribution of power and property. We can continue to disagree
Michael Hoover wrote:
while you, doug, seem temperamentally inclined to emphasize
capitalism's progressive tendencies
Doug Henwood wrote:
Not really. I just have to do it on PEN-L because no one else will.
It's also a very destructive and alienating system.
Yoshie Furuhashi wrote:
On 3/30/07, Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Hoover wrote:
while you, doug, seem temperamentally inclined to emphasize
capitalism's progressive tendencies
Doug Henwood wrote:
Not really. I just have to do it on PEN-L because no one else will.
It's also a very destructive
Financial wealth of capitalism presents itself other than in the form of a
great accumulation of commodities, and financial wealth dominates the
commodified wealth the latest and last globalization of capital. What forms
do these financial riches take and how are they created ? Should
The big positive of capitalism -- Marx wrote of its historic mission was to
prepare
the way for communism. Slavery and fuedalism also helped to promote this
progress,
but like capitalism, they became an outmoded form.
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 11:32:30AM -0700, Jim Devine wrote:
Marx's
Russian sources say that the US attack on Iran will come on April 6.
Do the Russians know what we don't or is this part of psychological
warfare?
http://fr.rian.ru/russia/20070330/62861794.html
Les États-Unis ont presque achevé la préparation d'une frappe contre
l'Iran (services secrets russes
Michael's summary of the positive side of capitalism (according to Marx)
seems fairly complete. A few observations.
As to the _present_ (1650 -- 1750 -- 1850 -- 1900): i.e, the present _at
any time_ during the growth and development of capitalism.
Capital ALWAYS, without exception, destroyed
Scheduled for home video release this week, Following Sean is an
uncommonly sensitive documentary on the counter-culture of the 1960s
and its lingering impact on a couple of families. Although radicals
might have an understandable aversion to anything smacking of hippy
culture, the film maintains
On 3/30/07, Carrol Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Every sentence in Michael's summary (and in this he is quite true to
Marx) points towards THE FUTURE. Progressive means ONLY that
possibilities (only possibilities, not certainties) for the future have
opened up. It never means that the present has
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uIwiPsgRrOs
I've been saying that about Roy for awhile. I recommend his CDs,
including those he did with the Foremen.
On 3/30/07, Dan Scanlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uIwiPsgRrOs
--
Jim Devine / Segui il tuo corso, e lascia dir le genti. (Go your own
way and let
people
Martin would deserve a reprimand if he had failed to notify us.
Michael Lebowitz waited for someone else [Hugo Chavez?] to alert us to
his book.
For anyone on the list, let us know about your good work.
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
Tel.
At 18:02 30/03/2007, michael p. wrote:
Martin would deserve a reprimand if he had failed to notify us.
Michael Lebowitz waited for someone else [Hugo Chavez?] to alert us to
his book.
NEVER! I immediately engaged in shameless promotion--- as in 'without
shame'; neither that nor Marty's nor
On 3/30/07, michael a. lebowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
These books are not money-makers--- for us, at least.
If only you all could assign them as textbooks and get like-minded
colleagues to do the same. . . .
--
Yoshie
On 3/30/07, Yoshie Furuhashi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nowadays, though, many Marxists who still insist on Marxist rhetoric
have in effect embraced capitalist development as good in and of
itself, as they have practically given up on any transition to a
socialist future. China and India are
But then we are victims of the market-driven publishers. Prices and
break-even points are what publishers are interested in.
Cheers, anthony
Anthony P. D'Costa, Professor
Comparative International Development
University
On 3/30/07, raghu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/30/07, Yoshie Furuhashi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nowadays, though, many Marxists who still insist on Marxist rhetoric
have in effect embraced capitalist development as good in and of
itself, as they have practically given up on any transition to
On 3/30/07, Yoshie Furuhashi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's up to the Chinese and the Indians to decide what their countries
should be like. But it would be better for them as well as for others
if their party leaders didn't pursue capitalist development in the
name of socialism.
--
Yoshie
Well, not only market-driven publishers. I remember talking with
Harry Magdoff years ago, posing the idea of doing a book on Marx's
Capital (probably what ultimately became 'Beyond CAPITAL') and he
said, why don't you write something that could sell some books so we
[at MR] can support publishing
On 3/30/07, raghu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/30/07, Yoshie Furuhashi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's up to the Chinese and the Indians to decide what their countries
should be like. But it would be better for them as well as for others
if their party leaders didn't pursue capitalist
The majority of Chinese and Indians are indeed exploited as Yoshie
notes. Even in China urban unemployment rates are high, formal sector
job creation is almost non-existent, and wages and working conditions
remain poor for the great majority. But isnt the question what
relationship we want to
The following is from the Korea Herald, a conservative mainstream
daily. It gives a good sense of conditions in South Korea. Korean
industry is rapidly moving to China and demanding that the government do
more to bring labor under control or else. What ever Asian miracle we
read about is
On 3/30/07, Martin Hart-Landsberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
remain poor for the great majority. But isnt the question what
relationship we want to have with these exploited workers. Should we
encourage their growing resistance or should we tell them that we, on
the left, celebrate the growth
Utility tax part of House speaker's budget plan
Tim Martin / Associated Press
LANSING -- House Speaker Andy Dillon's plan to help the state's budget
crisis includes a tax on utilities, which could add roughly $500 million a
year in revenue.
Dillon, a Redford Democrat in his first year
At issue is whether workers are wise to support the export-led growth
models that their governments are pursing. It is not a question of
whether a particular worker gets a job, but whether the growth process
really offers workers anything significant for the exploitation they
endure. If not,
On 3/30/07, raghu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/30/07, Martin Hart-Landsberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
remain poor for the great majority. But isnt the question what
relationship we want to have with these exploited workers. Should we
encourage their growing resistance or should we tell
On 3/30/07, Yoshie Furuhashi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Capitalist globalization, more often than not, comes as a package
deal, not as an a la carte menu (unless your country has already made
it capitalistically, in which case you have more power to set your own
terms than those who have weaker
On 3/30/07, raghu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is not that simple. The Chinese/Indian governments are hardly as
powerless as you seem to think. The global capital needs China/India just as
much as they need global capital. Theoretically there is no reason why a
sufficiently enlightened government
The Indian growth model is NOT FDI-driven, far from it. A paltry $10
billion (with a good chunk of it in portfolio investment) is no real
driver. In fact the FDI in selected sectors (auto, IT) have been pretty
good in terms of India's technological spillovers and firm capabilities.
The Chinese
47 matches
Mail list logo