[PEN-L] query du jour

2007-08-03 Thread Jim Devine
the meth. ind. one was yesterday's. Here's today's: is it accurate to say that classical economics (Smith, Ricardo, Marx, etc.) focused on the _tendency_ for markets to move toward equilibrium, with prices revolving around "centers of gravity" (natural prices, prices of production) but never real

Re: [PEN-L] query du jour

2007-08-03 Thread Michael Perelman
I see the difference differently. The NCs take the output as given, then show how it is divided equitably and efficiently -- from their perspective. The classical economistswere looking at an evolutionary path in which prices gravitated toward natural levels, but I don't think that equilibrium w

Re: [PEN-L] query du jour

2007-08-04 Thread Jim Devine
On 8/3/07, Michael Perelman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I see the difference differently. The NCs take the output as given, then > show how > it is divided equitably and efficiently -- from their perspective. it's true that there's no production in the Walrasian GE theory, but there can be prod

Re: [PEN-L] query du jour

2007-08-04 Thread Michael Perelman
Jim, I don't see the NC cobb douglas story as much about production as about how to distribute the productive assets, sort of a dual of the consumption problem. Does that make sense? On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 08:00:36AM -0700, Jim Devine wrote: > On 8/3/07, Michael Perelman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr

Re: [PEN-L] query du jour

2007-08-04 Thread Jim Devine
On 8/4/07, Michael Perelman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jim, I don't see the NC cobb douglas story as much about production as about > how to > distribute the productive assets, sort of a dual of the consumption problem. > Does > that make sense? I think the CD production function preceded usi

Re: [PEN-L] query du jour

2007-08-04 Thread Gassler Robert
Sorry, but there is production in the Walrasian system. His original book had it, but Cassel's truncated interpretation became popular before Walras was translated into English, thus giving rise to the misconception. >On 8/3/07, Michael Perelman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I see the difference

Re: [PEN-L] query du jour

2007-08-05 Thread Jim Devine
okay, I meant the "Arrow-Debreu-Walras" system. On 8/4/07, Gassler Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry, but there is production in the Walrasian system. His original book had > it, but Cassel's truncated interpretation became popular before Walras was > translated into English, thus giving