Speaking of "lying down with wolves," what do the names Wolfowitz and
Wolfensohn mean in German? What does Alterman mean?
Jim Devine, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: http://myweb.lmu.edu/jdevine/
Speaking of "lying down with wolves," what do the names Wolfowitz and
Wolfensohn mean in German? What does Alterman mean?
Jim Devine, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: http://myweb.lmu.edu/jdevine/
I don't know about German, but "Alter" means old in Yiddish. My parents
used to refer to an elderly pers
I know an old comedian who calls himself an "alter kacker."
Jim Devine, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: http://myweb.lmu.edu/jdevine/
>>Speaking of "lying down with wolves," what do the names Wolfowitz and
Wolfensohn mean in German? What does Alterman mean?<<
> I don't know about German, but
Why does it matter so much what "liberals" say and do? It's not 1970 anymore.
Doug
EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: http://myweb.lmu.edu/jdevine/
> -Original Message-
> From: PEN-L list [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doug
> Henwood
> Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 1:45 PM
> To: PEN-L@SUS.CSUCHICO.EDU
> Subject: Re: [PEN-L] When liberals lie down with wolve
Maybe it's because the number of liberals has fallen so much that it's
getting to where there almost as few as those on the left? They're
getting so that liberal organizations are just as small and pitiful as
leftist sects, so we can see them as competitors?
Jim Devine, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
we
"Devine, James" wrote:
>
> Maybe it's because the number of liberals has fallen so much that it's
> getting to where there almost as few as those on the left? They're
> getting so that liberal organizations are just as small and pitiful as
> leftist sects, so we can see them as competitors?
I'm no
I wrote:
>> Maybe it's because the number of liberals has fallen so much that
it's getting to where there almost as few as those on the left? They're
getting so that liberal organizations are just as small and pitiful as
leftist sects, so we can see them as competitors?<<
Carrol:
> I'm not sure h
"Devine, James" wrote:
>
>
> I think that's the right attitude. Whether someone is a "liberal" is of
> secondary or tertiary or even lowerary importance. Labels are much less
> important than concrete issues of politics.
I believe Marx had something along that line to say in the Critique of
the Go
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/11/05 4:44 PM >>>
Why does it matter so much what "liberals" say and do? It's not 1970
anymore.
Doug
<>
why did it matter then...
--
Please Note:
Due to Florida's very broad public records law, most writt
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/11/05 4:44 PM >>>
Why does it matter so much what "liberals" say and do? It's not 1970
anymore.
Doug
<>
why did it matter then... michael hoover
--
Please Note:
Due to Florida's very broad public record
as phil ochs suggested: love me, love me, love me, i'm a liberal... mh
--
Please Note:
Due to Florida's very broad public records law, most written communications to
or from College employees regarding College business are public recor
Michael Hoover wrote:
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/11/05 4:44 PM >>>
Why does it matter so much what "liberals" say and do? It's not 1970
anymore.
Doug
<>
why did it matter then...
Because liberalism was close to state power, and because it was
capable of co-opting more radical sentiments. Now
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3/13/2005 1:23:15 AM >>>
Michael Hoover wrote:
Because liberalism was close to state power, and because it was
capable of co-opting more radical sentiments. Now, it's pretty
marginal, even if the Nation's circ is 184,000.
Doug
<>
not really re. either of above, as for
It seemed to matter to a lot of radicals from Northeastern suburbs who were
rebelling against their parents who ran the "establishment". They
complained about how John Lindsay said he was not a racist but really did
this and this and this... They also would say, "I'd rather meet a racist
than a lib
Robert Scott Gassler wrote:
>
> It seemed to matter to a lot of radicals from Northeastern suburbs who were
> rebelling against their parents who ran the "establishment". They
> complained about how John Lindsay said he was not a racist but really did
> this and this and this... They also would say
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/14/05 4:54 AM >>>
It seemed to matter to a lot of radicals from Northeastern suburbs who
were
rebelling against their parents who ran the "establishment". They
complained about how John Lindsay said he was not a racist but really
did
this and this and this... They also woul
Better fold. I'm from Waco.
At 00:30 15/03/05, Michael Hoover wrote:
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/14/05 4:54 AM >>>
It seemed to matter to a lot of radicals from Northeastern suburbs who
were
rebelling against their parents who ran the "establishment". They
complained about how John Lindsay said he was
Now the chant sometimes refers to Bush.
At 20:21 14/03/05, you wrote:
Robert Scott Gassler wrote:
>
> It seemed to matter to a lot of radicals from Northeastern suburbs who were
> rebelling against their parents who ran the "establishment". They
> complained about how John Lindsay said he was not a
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/15/05 3:48 AM >>>
Better fold. I'm from Waco.
<>
nah, you don't know ocoee... mh
--
Please Note:
Due to Florida's very broad public records law, most written communications to
or from College employees
Isn't there a "K" in Wacko?
Jim Devine, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: http://myweb.lmu.edu/jdevine/
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/15/05 3:48 AM >>>
> Better fold. I'm from Waco.
> <>
>
> nah, you don't know ocoee... mh
Further proof that liberals ain't what they used to be. From a new
ABC/WashPost poll. Response to question, "Was the war in Iraq worth
fighting?"
YesNo
All 45%53
Democrats 18 80
Independents43 55
Republicans 81 18
Liberals20
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/15/05 5:26 PM >>>
Further proof that liberals ain't what they used to be. From a new
ABC/WashPost poll. Response to question, "Was the war in Iraq worth
fighting?"
YesNo
Liberals20 79
<>>
what % of liberals opposed vietnam war in 66
--- Michael Hoover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/15/05 5:26 PM >>>
> Further proof that liberals ain't what they used to
> be. From a new
> ABC/WashPost poll. Response to question, "Was the
> war in Iraq worth
> fighting?"
> YesNo
> Liberals20
> Further proof that liberals ain't what they used to be. From a new
> ABC/WashPost poll. Response to question, "Was the war in Iraq worth
> fighting?"
Why is the past tense used in this question?
Jim Devine
On Mar 11, 2005, at 1:13 PM, Devine, James wrote:
I know an old comedian who calls himself an "alter kacker."
There was an old guy in the deep south who had a sex change operation.
He was a altered cracker.
Dan
26 matches
Mail list logo