https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2192251
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|ctstream-33-1.fc39 |ctstream-33-1.fc39
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2192251
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|ctstream-33-1.fc39 |ctstream-33-1.fc39
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2192251
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|ctstream-33-1.fc39 |ctstream-33-1.fc39
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2192251
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|ctstream-33-1.fc39 |ctstream-33-1.fc39
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2192251
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|ctstream-33-1.fc39 |ctstream-33-1.fc39
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2192251
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
Notification time stamped 2023-05-10 16:57:36 UTC
From 645ca7c417022b4883e3e6da5b3af403946ddf81 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: May 10 2023 16:55:50 +
Subject: SPDX migration
Also:
- Use %license unconditionally
- Use author-independent source URL
---
diff --git
corsepiu commented on the pull-request: `Add conditions for build with/without
big frameworks` that you are following:
``
I am hesitant, because I fail to understand the rationale behind it and am
close to consider it "featuritis".
``
To reply, visit the link below
mspacek commented on the pull-request: `Add conditions for build with/without
big frameworks` that you are following:
``
@corsepiu Is it ok for you or not? :-)
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Type-Tiny/pull-request/1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2196756
--- Comment #2 from Jitka Plesnikova ---
*** Bug 2196757 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2196756
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2196757
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2196756
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jples...@redhat.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2196757
--- Comment #1 from Jitka Plesnikova ---
I created a pull request with a possible fix:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Class-Autouse/pull-request/1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2196757
Bug ID: 2196757
Summary: perl-Class-Autouse: FTBFS: Can't locate
inc/Module/Install/DSL.pm in @INC
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2196756
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2168842
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2196756
Bug ID: 2196756
Summary: perl-Class-Autouse-2.01-34.fc39 FTBFS: Can't locate
inc/Module/Install/DSL.pm
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL:
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Class-Autouse`
that you are following:
``
Update Makefile.PL to not use Module::Install::DSL
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Class-Autouse/pull-request/1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2113577
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-IO-Async: FTBFS in |perl-IO-Async: FTBFS in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2196755
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2168842
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2196755
Bug ID: 2196755
Summary: perl-IO-Async-0.802-2.fc39 FTBFS: A build dependency
on Test::Future::IO::Impl is not declared
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
OS: Linux
20 matches
Mail list logo