On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 05:19:34PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 12/07/2010 04:57 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
I applied the patch in September, because I completely forgot about that
email. The idea was install all modules into core directory
/usr/lib64/perl5 or /usr/share/perl5. The
On 12/09/2010 02:27 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 05:19:34PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 12/07/2010 04:57 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
If core and vendor are the same as it is in F-14, then it's non-existent
module looked up twice in the same path without luck.
So, my
On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 02:35:34PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 12/09/2010 02:27 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 05:19:34PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 12/07/2010 04:57 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
If core and vendor are the same as it is in F-14, then it's
On 12/09/2010 03:01 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 02:35:34PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 12/09/2010 02:27 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 05:19:34PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 12/07/2010 04:57 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
If core and vendor are the same
Hi,
Could somebody explain this change between f14 and f15?
f14: perl -V:vendorarch
vendorarch='/usr/lib64/perl5';
f15: perl -V:vendorarch
vendorarch='/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl';
This causes f15 to install their vendorarch'ed modules under
/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl
instead of
