On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 04:10:30PM +0900, Tatsuhiko Miyagawa wrote:
On Sat, 15 Dec 2001 09:10:33 -0500
Barrie Slaymaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now I see what you're after with the -M approach, thanks for the
example.
Cool.
I can understand that :) since CPAN is/seems a
On Wed, 19 Dec 2001, Barrie Slaymaker wrote:
I noticed that Test::Builder offers the ability to emit messages with
s/^/# /mg, which is very nice. Can/should this capability be exposed
via Test::Simple, Test::More, etc?
Can't you just use Test::Builder somewhere in your test script like so:
In perl.qa, you wrote:
Candidates for this sort of thing would be CGI::Test, Test::Cmd,
Test::Unit, Test::Mail and ExtUtils::TBone. And, of course, Barrie's
Test::Differences.
Actually, Test::Mail doesn't work like that. It's more or less a
wrapper around Test::More that handles incoming
In perl.qa, you wrote:
I think I have a solution to the rigidity of is(). ie. something with
the diagnostic output of is(), but the flexibility of ok().
It all makes sense, so what I really need is a better name.
How about:
compare($foo, =, $bar)
K.
--
Kirrily 'Skud' Robert - [EMAIL
On Wed, 19 Dec 2001 10:04:17 -0700, Tels wrote:
First, ok() is no no longer ok(), but is now is(), because ok() is no longer
ok to use with ok($this,$that); but is() is ok with $that. And then there is
isnt(), isn't it? Not to speak of the use of can_ok(), which you can use, ok?
isnt() $that
On Wed, 19 Dec 2001 05:12:05 -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 07:52:03AM -0500, Barrie Slaymaker wrote:
I noticed that Test::Builder offers the ability to emit messages with s/^/#
/mg, which is very nice. Can/should this capability be exposed via
Test::Simple,
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 01:52:12PM -0500, Kirrily Robert wrote:
Are we doing the time warp again, or are the Huskies just tired of
pulling the packets across the border?
How about:
compare($foo, =, $bar)
cmp_ok(). Close.
--
Michael G. Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 07:52:03AM -0500, Barrie Slaymaker wrote:
I noticed that Test::Builder offers the ability to emit messages with
s/^/# /mg, which is very nice. Can/should this capability be exposed
via Test::Simple, Test::More, etc?
Its been on the TODO list to toss a diag() into
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 04:10:30PM +0900, Tatsuhiko Miyagawa wrote:
On Sat, 15 Dec 2001 09:10:33 -0500
Barrie Slaymaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now I see what you're after with the -M approach, thanks for the
example.
Cool.
I can understand that :) since CPAN is/seems a
On Wed, 19 Dec 2001, Barrie Slaymaker wrote:
I noticed that Test::Builder offers the ability to emit messages with
s/^/# /mg, which is very nice. Can/should this capability be exposed
via Test::Simple, Test::More, etc?
Can't you just use Test::Builder somewhere in your test script like so:
In perl.qa, you wrote:
Candidates for this sort of thing would be CGI::Test, Test::Cmd,
Test::Unit, Test::Mail and ExtUtils::TBone. And, of course, Barrie's
Test::Differences.
Actually, Test::Mail doesn't work like that. It's more or less a
wrapper around Test::More that handles incoming
In perl.qa, you wrote:
I think I have a solution to the rigidity of is(). ie. something with
the diagnostic output of is(), but the flexibility of ok().
It all makes sense, so what I really need is a better name.
How about:
compare($foo, =, $bar)
K.
--
Kirrily 'Skud' Robert - [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
On 11-Dec-01 Kirrily Robert tried to scribble about:
In perl.qa, you wrote:
I think I have a solution to the rigidity of is(). ie. something with
the diagnostic output of is(), but the flexibility of ok().
It all makes sense, so what I really need is
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 02:07:56PM -0500, Kirrily Robert wrote:
Actually, Test::Mail doesn't work like that. It's more or less a
wrapper around Test::More that handles incoming email. Doesn't
implement any of its own ok()-like routines at all, just makes it easy
to use Test::More's routines
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 12:20:35PM -0700, chromatic wrote:
Something like this?
Something uncannily like this, only without the literal tabs.
diffing against a directory tree is odd... there must be a better
way.
I usually just check each individual file into RCS (vc-register-buffer
for
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 03:50:12PM -0500, Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 01:52:12PM -0500, Kirrily Robert wrote:
Are we doing the time warp again, or are the Huskies just tired of
pulling the packets across the border?
How about:
compare($foo, =, $bar)
The good news is lib.t and MM_Unix just went into the core.
The even better news is Wolfgang Laun came riding in out of the East
and has begun fixing perlcc! He's repairing B::Assembler and
B::Disassembler and has written assembler.t
And not to break the trend, the Net::Ping CPAN distribution
17 matches
Mail list logo
