The Phalanx project has started its rampup to an official
announcement. Phalanx is going to beef up the tests, coverage and
docs on Perl and 100 heavily-used modules from CPAN.
The project page is at http://qa.perl.org/phalanx/. Please take a
look, tell me your thoughts, and if there are any
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 10:19:35PM +0100, Fergal Daly wrote:
> ok 1.2.3 allows this
>
> ok 1.1.1
> ok 1.2.1
> ok 1.1.2
> ok 1.2.2
>
> so if people use the Test::AtRuntime they can also execute those tests at test
> time, just allocate subblock 1.* to all the runtime tests. They will appear
> in
ok 1.2.3 allows this
ok 1.1.1
ok 1.2.1
ok 1.1.2
ok 1.2.2
so if people use the Test::AtRuntime they can also execute those tests at test
time, just allocate subblock 1.* to all the runtime tests. They will appear
in the output, intermixed with all your other tests but they will not
interfere wi
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 12:17:39PM -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> Not if you introduce an end tag (though I'd rather not).
Why not? I'd like the ability to specify a variant of no plan that is
roughly "it ain't over until the fat lady sings" and then if I don't
print out a singing fat lady as
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 02:39:56PM +0100, Fergal Daly wrote:
> Full nesting requires more state to be held and as it stands, doesn't help in
> your example below. It could be altered to support it though by adding
> support for standalone sub blocks, ie where the harness should temporarily
> for
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 08:34:44AM -0500, Danny R. Faught wrote:
> Michael G Schwern wrote:
> >What books out there are of use for those wanting to learn Perl testing?
> >They don't necessarily have to be specificly about *Perl* testing.
> >I've put up a Wiki page to generate a listing.
> >http://w
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 02:38:03PM +0100, Fergal Daly wrote:
> 1 problem here is that you have not indicated anywhere how many times you will
> be extending the plan
Some sort of *optional* way to specify that would be nice.
> > The former has the large disadvange of requiring all subtests to b
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 09:46:07PM -0500, Danny R. Faught wrote:
> Re: The Craft of Software Testing...
>
> Adam Turoff wrote:
> >It's out of print and nearly impossible to find. I haven't read it yet,
> >so I can't say whether it is as seminal as McBreen says it is.
>
> Interesting - bn.com c
On Wednesday 20 August 2003 22:19, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> That's subtests having overall test state. Ideally don't want the subtests
> to have *any* awareness that they're being run as a subtest.
The state is held in the Test::Builder object just as currently, it's just
that that object has
On Wednesday 20 August 2003 22:14, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> 1..2
> ok 1
> 1..3
> ok 1
> ok 2
> ok 3
> 3..1
> ok 2
1 problem here is that you have not indicated anywhere how many times you will
be extending the plan so maybe there's a
1..9
ok 1
...
ok 9
missing off the end, there's no way to
Michael G Schwern wrote:
What books out there are of use for those wanting to learn Perl testing?
They don't necessarily have to be specificly about *Perl* testing.
I've put up a Wiki page to generate a listing.
http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/cgi-bin/perl-qa-wiki.cgi?TestingBooks
Where is this page
11 matches
Mail list logo
