On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 05:37:39PM +0100, Philippe 'BooK' Bruhat wrote:
> > I'm going with just straight, unsecured socket communications and an ad hoc
> > protocol. At this point, encryption is not necessary. There's nothing worth
> > encrypting. To see why, look at the example protocol convers
On Mar 1, 2004, at 9:12 AM, Philippe 'BooK' Bruhat wrote:
Which means the server and client could communicate as IRC bots,
with Net::IRC or a similar module?
Jabber.
David
Le lundi 01 mars 2004 à 16:53, Leon Brocard écrivait:
> Michael G Schwern sent the following bits through the ether:
>
> > So what I need is some way to set up a network of test servers such that
> > I can say "test this module for me" and my testing client would ship it
> > to as many test server
Michael G Schwern sent the following bits through the ether:
> So what I need is some way to set up a network of test servers such that
> I can say "test this module for me" and my testing client would ship it
> to as many test servers as it can find and get the results back all in
> just a few mi
Le lundi 23 février 2004 à 14:06, Michael G Schwern écrivait:
>
> I'm going with just straight, unsecured socket communications and an ad hoc
> protocol. At this point, encryption is not necessary. There's nothing worth
> encrypting. To see why, look at the example protocol conversation at
> h
