Re: Kwalitee and has_test_*

2005-04-03 Thread Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 09:00:17PM +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote: Well, kwalitee != quality. Currently, kwalitee basically only says how well-formed a distribution is. For my definition of well-formed :-) But I'm always open to suggestion etc. Since you ask... An important part of kwalitee to

Re: Why a scoreboard?

2005-04-03 Thread Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 10:43:57AM -0500, Ricardo SIGNES wrote: * David A. Golden [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-04-02T05:27:18] Andy Lester wrote: Why is there a scoreboard? Why do we care about rankings? Why is it necessary to compare one measure to another? What purpose is being served?

Testing Book Reviewers Wanted!

2005-04-03 Thread chromatic
Hi everyone, lurkers and all, I'm looking for five or six people to participate in a technical book review this week, reviewing eight chapters of a book about software testing with Perl. You don't have to be a testing guru or a Perl guru, but you need to have at least some desire to learn more

Re: Kwalitee and has_test_*

2005-04-03 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 03:09:17PM -0700, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote: Since you ask... An important part of kwalitee to me is that Makefile.PL / Build.PL run successfully with stdin redirected to /dev/null (that is, that any user interaction be optional). Another is that a