It used to be that WWW::Mechanize was a good enough testing tool for
my web applications.
It doesn't do Javascript, but I used very minimal
Javascript and thus worked around that limitation.
Along comes AJAX. It offers benefits that make JavaScript seem worth
using.
But now how I can test
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 20:25:48 +, Mark Stosberg wrote:
But now how I can test the application? I have a link that uses AJAX to
pull in some content that gets displayed in a new layer, including a
form I'd like to submit.
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 08:25:48PM +, Mark Stosberg wrote:
It used to be that WWW::Mechanize was a good enough testing tool for
my web applications.
It doesn't do Javascript, but I used very minimal
Javascript and thus worked around that limitation.
Along comes AJAX. It offers
--- Mark Stosberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What are other folks doing to test web applications that make heavy
use
of JavaScript?
If you want to leverage your Perl testing knowledge, you can check out
Test.Simple from JSAN:
http://openjsan.org/doc/t/th/theory/Test/Simple/0.21/index.html
On 2005-11-28, Ovid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Mark Stosberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What are other folks doing to test web applications that make heavy
use
of JavaScript?
If you want to leverage your Perl testing knowledge, you can check out
Test.Simple from JSAN:
On 2005-11-02, Luke Closs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, yesterday Test::WWW::Selenium was uploaded to CPAN, so Selenium
can now be driven by perl!
Test::WWW::Selenium seems interesting, but I could use an example it
would be useful to use, versus the standard techniques.
From the docs,
--- Mark Stosberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://openjsan.org/doc/t/th/theory/Test/Simple/0.21/index.html
I've been using it and once you get it set up, it's fairly straight
forward. You can see a sample in my journal:
http://use.perl.org/~Ovid/journal/27229
Interesting.
And is
