Tyler MacDonald wrote:
> Sébastien Aperghis-Tramoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > For CPAN smokers based on CPAN::YACSmoke, the answer is: test the
> > presence of the AUTOMATED_TESTING environment variable. See also
> > the following page for more details:
> >
> > http://search.cpan.org/dist/C
Sébastien Aperghis-Tramoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For CPAN smokers based on CPAN::YACSmoke, the answer is: test the
> presence of the AUTOMATED_TESTING environment variable. See also
> the following page for more details:
>
> http://search.cpan.org/dist/CPAN-YACSmoke/lib/CPAN/YACSmoke/FAQ.
Tyler MacDonald wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is there any way to tell if my package is being tested automatically
> under CPAN::Testers?
For CPAN smokers based on CPAN::YACSmoke, the answer is: test the
presence of the AUTOMATED_TESTING environment variable. See also
the following page for more deta
Hello,
Is there any way to tell if my package is being tested automatically
under CPAN::Testers? Here's the situation:
I have a DBI extension (DBIx::Transaction) whose unit tests
currently depend on a valid DSN being available. SQLite makes a good testbed
for "mock" databases, so
On Jan 11, 2006, at 4:15 AM, Andrew Savige wrote:
Damian's Smart::Comments module filters specially formatted
comments and can do assertions and quite a lot more.
I especially like the idea of filtered comments - rather elegant
solution.
Also, we've given some thought to the issue of whet
On Jan 10, 2006, at 8:36 AM, dakkar wrote:
This entry in BooK's use.perl journal might help you:
http://use.perl.org/~BooK/journal/25445
Thanks - that is a helpful idea.
---
Matisse Enzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.matisse.net/ - htt
--- "A. Pagaltzis" wrote:
> Additive filters that the same code can run without are
> sane when used carefully, and they're easy to create if the
> trigger is a special comment or better yet POD section:
Damian's Smart::Comments module filters specially formatted
comments and can do assertions and