* demerphq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-02-01T03:26:55]
> And I think you've conveniently sidestepped my main point which is
> that TODO tests passing are errors. Consider you have two TODO tests,
> both of which depend on a common set of functionality. Both should
> pass or both should fail.
I just
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 11:30:13AM +0100, Tels wrote:
> Problaby just because the last guy running RISC OS has died 4 years ago.
> SCNR :-)
Well, the list is *slightly* more active than that:
http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.riscos
Nicholas Clark
Moin,
On Friday 03 February 2006 11:04, David Landgren wrote:
> David Cantrell wrote:
> > brian d foy wrote:
> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> Hopefully it will be something like:
> >>> $I::don't::bother::to::write::portable::code=1;
> >>> ;-)
[snip]
> >
> > I want my code to be more like File
Tyler MacDonald writes:
> Chris Dolan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [lots of author test examples, including:]
>
> > * versionsync.t - Checks that the $VERSION is the same in all bin/*
> > and *.pm files. This test is pointless after release, since it's
> > already been tested before relea
David Cantrell wrote:
brian d foy wrote:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hopefully it will be something like:
$I::don't::bother::to::write::portable::code=1;
;-)
Seriously though, I would expect things in Win32::* to only work on
Windows, things in Linux::* only to work on linux, and so on for many
