[Time to stop spamming multiple lists. Followups to p6c for bikeshedding.]
On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 10:30:22AM +0300, Gaal Yahas wrote:
: On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 02:06:27PM +0800, Agent Zhang wrote:
: >is $got, $expected, todo :pugs<6.2.13>, :p6p5<0.110>;
: >
: > Happily, Audrey has already i
在 2006/8/12 下午 6:15 時,Nicholas Clark 寫到:
There's nothing technical stopping the Perl 6 tests being on
svn.perl.org,
but in a different svn repository from the current repositories, is
there?
Well, technically yes, except that SVK doesn't support svn:external yet.
Setting a svn:external pro
On 11 Aug 2006, at 09:25, Ovid wrote:
After thinking about Daniel Risse's idea for a Test::Terminated
module, I've been thinking this is something which should be
incorporated directly in TAP. Plans become optional but the last
line of the TAP output MUST be something like:
tests finis
Ovid wrote:
> tests finished
I like it. Backward compatible and elegant in its declarative style.
(Therefor probably too good to be true.)
Regards,
David Golden
On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 09:44:38PM +0800, Audrey Tang wrote:
> That's assuming that the new repo, say, http://svn.perl.org/
> perl6tests/, can
> give out commit permissions to parrot and pugs committers, yes.
>
> But as Jerry's initial motivation was moving Perl 6 tests to a more
> official
>
On 8/12/06, jerry gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
for "managed," i have a few ideas. currently, the suite lives in the
pugs repo. this is a fine first approximation, but i believe it will
soon be time to move this suite[3]. the question is, should it be
moved into their own repository, or into the
On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 02:06:27PM +0800, Agent Zhang wrote:
>is $got, $expected, todo :pugs<6.2.13>, :p6p5<0.110>;
>
> Happily, Audrey has already implemented the $?PUGS_VERSION variable,
> which can ease the implementation of such &todo subs:
I've added a %?CONFIG variable which I propose
e
在 2006/8/12 上午 3:01 時,jerry gay 寫到:
for "managed," i have a few ideas. currently, the suite lives in the
pugs repo. this is a fine first approximation, but i believe it will
soon be time to move this suite (it doesn't make sense to keep the
"official" tests in a non-official repo in the long ter
On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 03:32:47PM +0800, Audrey Tang wrote:
>
> ?b 2006/8/12 ?W?? 3:01 ???Ajerry gay ?g???G
>
> >the question is, should it be moved into their own repository, or
> >into the repo of
> >the "official" perl6 implementation (if such a beast will indeed
> >exist,)
>
> Currentl