On Dec 24, 2007 12:30 AM, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thinking on this a little more, there is the issue of folks like me who share
> a single CPAN configuration file across multiple Perl installations. I don't
> know how common that is to have a stable and devel perl running of
Michael G Schwern wrote:
> David Golden wrote:
>> On Dec 23, 2007 2:37 AM, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> [1] It can be argued that bleadperl testers should probably not email
>>> authors,
>>> and maybe they aren't I can't tell from these archives, but at least the
>>> work
>>>
David Golden wrote:
> On Dec 23, 2007 2:37 AM, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [1] It can be argued that bleadperl testers should probably not email
>> authors,
>> and maybe they aren't I can't tell from these archives, but at least the work
>> is useful. CPAN::Reporter could chan
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007, Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 14:22:05 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andreas J. Koenig) said:
> 1. You get a fail report with an error message that doesn't tell you
>exactly what went wrong.
> 2. You rewrite your test in a way that it does tell you more.
> On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 11:12:43 -0800, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Saturday 22 December 2007 05:22:05 Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
>> 1. You get a fail report with an error message that doesn't tell you
>> exactly what went wrong.
>>
>> 2. You rewrite your test in a way that
On Dec 23, 2007 2:37 AM, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [1] It can be argued that bleadperl testers should probably not email authors,
> and maybe they aren't I can't tell from these archives, but at least the work
> is useful. CPAN::Reporter could change the default configuration
