Re: done_testing()

2009-02-04 Thread Ovid
- Original Message From: Michael G Schwern schw...@pobox.com First of all, thank you! This is fantastic work and I'm sure it will make a lot of people happy. Finally, this makes it now possible to build up the test plan as you go. I'd like to put first order support into

Re: done_testing()

2009-02-04 Thread David E. Wheeler
On Feb 4, 2009, at 6:35 AM, Ovid wrote: Thoughts? (The first idea is bugging me because I swear I had thought of a show-stopper over lunch, but for the life of me, I can't recall what it was). Must've been a damn good lunch. How many pints did you kill? D

Re: [test-more-users] Re: done_testing()

2009-02-04 Thread Gaurav Vaidya
Hello, On Feb 4, 2009, at 10:35 PM, Ovid wrote: Thoughts on first order support: use Test::More; plan(3); pass; pass; pass; plan(2) pass; pass; done_testing() # optional I just made a branch of Test::Builder which does this. You can see the expected behaviour in the tests at:

Re: done_testing()

2009-02-04 Thread Ovid
- Original Message From: David E. Wheeler da...@kineticode.com (The first idea is bugging me because I swear I had thought of a show-stopper over lunch, but for the life of me, I can't recall what it was). Must've been a damn good lunch. How many pints did you kill? Only

Re: done_testing()

2009-02-04 Thread David E. Wheeler
On Feb 4, 2009, at 3:15 PM, Ovid wrote: Only one. The BBC frowns on it if you come back *completely* wasted. I'd probably get a stern talking to if I did. Ooh, scary. D