ink about it, I seem to recall reading somewhere about
dual-life modules not being listed in the main Perl page. Dual-life
modules are those that are both core AND are distributed seperatly on
CPAN. Don't remember where I saw that, and don't know if it's true or
relevant here...
Cheers,
--
Offer Kaye
is that *easier* than installing a pre-compiled package?
Of course I'm assuming that the PPM method *works* as intended...
obviously it doesn't... but in an ideal world, all else being equal,
PPM would be easier, IMHO.
Cheers,
--
Offer Kaye
On 2/6/06, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
>
> http://perldoc.perl.org/perl58delta.html#New-Modules-and-Pragmata
>
I see what you mean... what threw me off was that it is not listed under:
http://search.cpan.org/dist/perl-5.8.8/
Cheers,
--
Offer Kaye
On 2/5/06, Offer Kaye wrote:
>
> [3]
> http://ppm.activestate.com/BuildStatus/5.8-windows/windows-5.8/Scalar-List-Util-1.15.txt
>
Something funky here...
Last night I looked at "Scalar-List-Util"... but the correct name as
Tyler said is "Scalar-List-Utils", with a
t DLLs etc., I don't think any of
Blizzard's 5.5 million customers have ever had a problem installing
WoW because they were missing a DLL from some Office version... Just
to give an example... why should a PPM package be any different? Yes,
I'm a noob when it comes to these things, sorry :)
Cheers,
--
Offer Kaye
On 2/5/06, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> On Sunday 05 February 2006 13:54, Tels wrote:
> > Moin Offer Kaye (sorry, can't identify which part of your name which is
> > the one you are called by :-)
> >
>
> Just for everybody's information:
>
> Offer is his first
y of out date..
I guess that many more people use Perl on Linux boxes, but there are
still uses for Perl on Windows... ;-)
It would be wonderful to be able to fully use CPAN on Windows, with
the same level of comfort that today's pre-packged PPM files already
provide.
Thanks,
--
Offer Kaye
