On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 10:44:59PM -0500, Ken Williams wrote:
> The reason is that I generally just submit test results blindly, without
> checking whether someone else has already reported a particular
> package/version/platform combination. This works okay for me because I
> seem to be the only
On Thu, 17 May 2001, Ken Williams wrote:
> This includes modules like GD.pm (requires several external libraries)
> or HTML::Mason (has interactive 'make test').
Having a list of modules that have an interactive "make test" and having
some standard flag in the environment that makes them non-inte
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adam Turoff) wrote:
>Allow me to clarify -- I'm interested in hacking the cpan-testers data.
>This will most likely lead to a facelift for testers.cpan.org. :-)
>
>Graham asked me to discuss the changes I'd like to see with the
>testers site. Here's what I have in mind:
>
>
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 03:27:56PM -0400, Adam Turoff wrote:
> Is the data used for testers.cpan.org available anywhere in one
> comprehensive chunk?
>
> I looked around testers.cpan.org, and from what I can tell, it's
> only available in a pre-digested report format. Surely it's
> reconstructa
No directly, but it could be. The only place it exists as a single
thing is in the MySQL database that tester.cpan.org works from.
Graham.
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 03:27:56PM -0400, Adam Turoff wrote:
> Is the data used for testers.cpan.org available anywhere in one
> comprehensive chunk?
>
>
Is the data used for testers.cpan.org available anywhere in one
comprehensive chunk?
I looked around testers.cpan.org, and from what I can tell, it's
only available in a pre-digested report format. Surely it's
reconstructable from the cpan-testers archive, but anywhere else?
Thanks,
Z.
