Hi!
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 03:29:10AM +0100, Tim Bunce wrote:
The DBI gets 9. The one failure is permissions_ok:
permissions_ok (i.e. all files are read/writable by extracting user)
Why is that a kwalitee issue? I don't think it warrants impacting the kwalitee.
First: Currently there
Hi!
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 04:56:40AM +0200, Paul Johnson wrote:
At the moment the focus seems very much on packaging. That's fine, but
it does mean that correctly packaged junk looks pretty good.
True, but most junk /is/ packaged badly.
At its much easier to check for bad packages than
On Sat, 24 Jul 2004, Thomas Klausner wrote:
- Test coverage.
Impossibly, because CPANTS does not run code.
But it could fetch it from some other place that does it, right ?
What about adding (optional) coverage reports to the reports
the CPAN testers send in ?
Gabor
Hi!
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 08:41:58AM +0200, James Mastros wrote:
- Having POD
- Not having the POD that h2xs puts in
I wonder how many dists are authored by R.U. Thor :-)
- Having a README
thats allready covered.
BTW, I tend to think that modules that require lots of other things
Hi!
On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 07:46:30PM +0300, Gabor Szabo wrote:
On Sat, 24 Jul 2004, Thomas Klausner wrote:
- Test coverage.
Impossibly, because CPANTS does not run code.
But it could fetch it from some other place that does it, right ?
Right. Back when Leon was maintaining CPANTS
On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 06:35:44PM +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote:
Hi!
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 03:29:10AM +0100, Tim Bunce wrote:
The DBI gets 9. The one failure is permissions_ok:
permissions_ok (i.e. all files are read/writable by extracting user)
Why is that a kwalitee issue?
Paul Johnson wrote:
At the moment the focus seems very much on packaging. That's fine, but
it does mean that correctly packaged junk looks pretty good. In time,
some more metrics would be good. Some suggestions:
- How do the CPAN testers reports look?
- What does cpanratings think?
- Some
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 08:41:58AM +0200, James Mastros wrote:
BTW, I tend to think that modules that require lots of other things
deserve lower kwalitee...
Because reinventing the wheel is a good thing, right?
Tony
Hi!
I ran CPANTS today, you can view results here:
http://cpants.dev.zsi.at/
( or http://test1.dev.zsi.at if DNS isn't updated..)
in /metrics there is a yaml-file for each dist
cpants.db (or cpants.db.gz) is a SQLite DB file
Oh, there might be a bug, because 100 dists didn't get any
On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 04:28:08PM +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote:
Hi!
I ran CPANTS today, you can view results here:
http://cpants.dev.zsi.at/
( or http://test1.dev.zsi.at if DNS isn't updated..)
in /metrics there is a yaml-file for each dist
cpants.db (or cpants.db.gz) is a SQLite
On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 05:25:38PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 04:28:08PM +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote:
Hi!
I ran CPANTS today, you can view results here:
Oooh. Nice
Agreed. I think it is a great start. Thanks very much for your work.
Max Kwalitee is
11 matches
Mail list logo
