Re: Counting tests, vi vs. emacs, and abortion

2009-03-16 Thread Andy Lester
On Mar 16, 2009, at 6:25 PM, Michael G Schwern wrote: Ok, write it. Fair enough. http://www.perlfoundation.org/perl5/index.cgi? test_counts is the start. I don't mean to stomp on new discussion, just the rehashing of the old. My apologies if my skimming of the thread conflated the two

Re: Counting tests, vi vs. emacs, and abortion

2009-03-16 Thread Fergal Daly
Great idea. Why didn't someone think of it before and refer to that page in the first posting in this thread and also in the middle... F 2009/3/16 Andy Lester : > > How about we put up a page somewhere that discusses the pros and cons of > counting tests, and then whenever the quarterly discussio

Re: Counting tests, vi vs. emacs, and abortion

2009-03-16 Thread Michael G Schwern
Andy Lester wrote: > > How about we put up a page somewhere that discusses the pros and cons of > counting tests, and then whenever the quarterly discussion of LOLZ YOU > ARE COUNTING YOUR TESTZ FOR NO REASON! vs. YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT HAPPENS > WITHOUT A PLAN N00B! rears its head, we can refer peop

Re: Counting tests, vi vs. emacs, and abortion

2009-03-16 Thread Andy Lester
How about we put up a page somewhere that discusses the pros and cons of counting tests, and then whenever the quarterly discussion of LOLZ YOU ARE COUNTING YOUR TESTZ FOR NO REASON! vs. YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT HAPPENS WITHOUT A PLAN N00B! rears its head, we can refer people there. Some peopl