On Tuesday 02 September 2008 10:48:38 David Golden wrote:
Instead of the annoyance of authors writing warn $foo and exit 0,
now they'll need to use configure_requires in META.yml to demand an
up-to-date version of Module::Build. And it still won't work on an
older Perl with an older CPAN or
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 2:24 PM, chromatic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... but every time I see yet another arcane cantrip to add to my projects to
work around brokenness in CPAN Testers clients, a little bit more of my
motivation to care slips away.
You only need one and you'll never need to
On Sep 2, 2008, at 2:04 PM, David Golden wrote:
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 2:24 PM, chromatic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... but every time I see yet another arcane cantrip to add to my
projects to
work around brokenness in CPAN Testers clients, a little bit more
of my
motivation to care slips
On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 02:53:30PM -0500, Graham Barr wrote:
I would contest that the Makefile.PL or Build.PL cannot
be known to be a failure of the distribution, so the Artificial
Intelligence that you have programmed into CPAN testers is flawed.
That's why I default to *not*
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Graham Barr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
exit if $ENV{AUTOMATED_TESTING};
Which removed the usefulness of those that do testing correctly and submit
useful reports
My point was that authors can opt-out if keeping up is too annoying.
I would hope that authors
On Tuesday 02 September 2008 14:09:04 David Golden wrote:
Remember -- this whole thread started with why exit 0? Is that
really too much to ask an author with particularly unusual
requirements to learn and use?
Changing the way some 6000 registered authors work to meet the needs of one
On Sep 2, 2008, at 4:23 PM, chromatic wrote:
Changing the way some 6000 registered authors work to meet the needs
of one
particular domain purportedly for their benefit seems to be the
wrong way
around, at least to me.
Does anyone on CPAN Testers have any idea what their constituencies
* Andy Lester [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-09-02 22:20]:
Can the cpan-testers please get a dedicated list that is not perl-qa?
So there is Perl-QA, TAPx-Dev (where I’ve been dragging my feet
to subscribe), the IETF TAP list, the Module::Build and CPANPLUS
lists, and now cpan-testers-discuss. I am
On Sep 2, 2008, at 7:44 PM, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote:
Seriously? First you say you want them to play in their own
sandbox, then you say they’ve never asked anyone?
Yes, both of those are true.
Posting to a mailing list about how CPAN Testers' internals works is
not at all the same as
* Andy Lester [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-09-03 02:55]:
On Sep 2, 2008, at 7:44 PM, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote:
Seriously? First you say you want them to play in their own
sandbox, then you say they’ve never asked anyone?
Yes, both of those are true.
Yes, taking separately and literally, they are
10 matches
Mail list logo
