Philippe Bruhat (BooK) wrote:
> Kobesearch's sources are available.
search.cpan.org uses swish-e which is very configurable. We (meaning $work) do
category/tagging searching with swish-e in lots of other places.
--
Michael Peters
Plus Three, LP
* On Sun, Apr 06 2008, Guy Hulbert wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-06-04 at 23:47 +0200, Philippe Bruhat (BooK) wrote:
>> > It still looks like a big job to me.
>> >
>>
>> Kobesearch's sources are available.
>
> See Jonathan Rockaway's last reply in this thread. His stuff looks
> really good. He pointed
On Sun, 2008-06-04 at 19:25 -0400, Guy Hulbert wrote:
> Jonathan Rockaway
Sorry. Should have been 'Rockway'.
--
--gh
On Sun, 2008-06-04 at 23:47 +0200, Philippe Bruhat (BooK) wrote:
> > It still looks like a big job to me.
> >
>
> Kobesearch's sources are available.
See Jonathan Rockaway's last reply in this thread. His stuff looks
really good. He pointed me to this (offlist):
http://git.jrock.us/?p=MetaCP
On Sat, Apr 05, 2008 at 09:18:21AM -0400, Guy Hulbert wrote:
>
> Concisely, I think the best solution is to add some restrictions at the
> upload interface. To be consistent with TMTOWTDI, these would not
> prevent modules from being uploaded but not following them would result
> in making the mo
On Sat, 2008-05-04 at 15:16 +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> Why do you feel my previous email was not concise or definite? I admit
coulda woulda shoulda ...
> it was
> a sort-of brainstorming email, but it was not too long. If you want a
this reply is even longer ;-)
> one
> paragraph summary t
On Sat, 2008-05-04 at 16:54 +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> On Saturday 05 April 2008, Guy Hulbert wrote:
> > On Sat, 2008-05-04 at 15:16 +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> > > one
> > > paragraph summary then:
> > >
> > >
> > > I suggest having a feed of human readable (and possibly machine
> >
On Sat, 2008-05-04 at 12:21 -0500, Jonathan Rockway wrote:
> > So what do you think - is there an interest in this?
>
> I think you should just do it. Then we can see if there is interest or
> not.
I will be doing the part I volunteered for ... sooner or later even if
it's just for my own use.
On Sat, 2008-05-04 at 14:02 +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> In regards to the previous discussion about trimming down CPAN and finding
I don't think trimming is necessary if you are successful with this.
IMO the problem is just finding things, which your proposal addresses.
> better way
* On Sat, Apr 05 2008, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> In regards to the previous discussion about trimming down CPAN and finding
> better ways to find quality modules, I got an idea of making CPAN "category"
> reviews. The idea was originally derived from Freshmeat.net where they often
> have
On Apr 5, 2008, at 6:02 AM, Shlomi Fish wrote:
Hi all!
In regards to the previous discussion about trimming down CPAN and
finding
better ways to find quality modules, I got an idea of making CPAN
"category"
reviews. The idea was originally derived from Freshmeat.net where
they often
have
On Saturday 05 April 2008, Guy Hulbert wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-05-04 at 15:16 +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> > one
> > paragraph summary then:
> >
> >
> > I suggest having a feed of human readable (and possibly machine
> > readable)
> > reviews of the modules in various CPAN categories, as
Hi!
Thanks for your email.
On Saturday 05 April 2008, Guy Hulbert wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-05-04 at 14:02 +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> > Hi all!
> >
> > In regards to the previous discussion about trimming down CPAN and
> > finding
>
> I don't think trimming is necessary if you are successful with th
Hi all!
In regards to the previous discussion about trimming down CPAN and finding
better ways to find quality modules, I got an idea of making CPAN "category"
reviews. The idea was originally derived from Freshmeat.net where they often
have category reviews of the various software hosted there
14 matches
Mail list logo
