Re: Preparing a new Test::* module

2008-04-09 Thread Thomas Klausner
Hi! On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 02:49:05PM +0100, Fergal Daly wrote: > On 09/04/2008, Gabor Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 10:14 PM, Fergal Daly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I would say put as much as possible of this outside the Test:: > > > namespace and then wra

Re: Preparing a new Test::* module

2008-04-09 Thread Fergal Daly
On 09/04/2008, Gabor Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 10:14 PM, Fergal Daly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I would say put as much as possible of this outside the Test:: > > namespace and then wrap in a thin Test:: wrapper. I wish I'd done this > > with Test::Deep, it

Re: Preparing a new Test::* module

2008-04-09 Thread Gabor Szabo
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 10:14 PM, Fergal Daly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would say put as much as possible of this outside the Test:: > namespace and then wrap in a thin Test:: wrapper. I wish I'd done this > with Test::Deep, it's on the todo list but I'll never get around to > it, I am not

Re: Preparing a new Test::* module

2008-04-09 Thread Ovid
--- "Randy J. Ray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Test::Text::Format (generic interface) > > Test::Text::Format::XML > > Test::Text::Format::YAML > > Test::Text::Format::Etcetera > > > > Feels a bit clumsy. I tend to dislike starting out three levels deep > unless > the middle level already exist

Re: Preparing a new Test::* module

2008-04-07 Thread Aristotle Pagaltzis
* Randy J. Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-07 02:00]: > Right now, I plan on: > > * XML validity against a DTD > * XML validity against a XML schema > * XML validity against a RelaxNG schema > * YAML validity > * JSON validity > * Content testing via some combo of Test::Deep and/or built-in > c

Re: Preparing a new Test::* module

2008-04-07 Thread Fergal Daly
On 07/04/2008, Randy J. Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > All, > > Inspired by a u.p.o journal post that Ovid made ( > http://use.perl.org/~Ovid/journal/36010), I've been working on a module that > will unify testing capabilities for various markup/serialization formats. > Right now, I plan on:

Re: Preparing a new Test::* module

2008-04-07 Thread Elliot Shank
Randy J. Ray wrote: On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 6:18 PM, Elliot Shank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Test::Text::Format (generic interface) Test::Text::Format::XML Test::Text::Format::YAML Test::Text::Format::Etcetera Feels a bit clumsy. I tend to dislike starting out three levels deep unless the midd

Re: Preparing a new Test::* module

2008-04-07 Thread Randy J. Ray
On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 6:18 PM, Elliot Shank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Randy J. Ray wrote: > > > One thing I would like advice on (besides suggestions for future > > features), > > is, errr, the name. Right now, I'm leaning towards Test::Markup. That > > might > > wind up the YAML guys a bit, t

Re: Preparing a new Test::* module

2008-04-06 Thread Elliot Shank
Randy J. Ray wrote: One thing I would like advice on (besides suggestions for future features), is, errr, the name. Right now, I'm leaning towards Test::Markup. That might wind up the YAML guys a bit, though (which is actually a quite-acceptable bonus to me), possibly the JSON camp as well. So I

Preparing a new Test::* module

2008-04-06 Thread Randy J. Ray
All, Inspired by a u.p.o journal post that Ovid made ( http://use.perl.org/~Ovid/journal/36010), I've been working on a module that will unify testing capabilities for various markup/serialization formats. Right now, I plan on: * XML validity against a DTD * XML validity against a XML schema * XM