David Landgren wrote:
I don't know how to distinguish between someone who likes to jumps
through hoops and someone who cares about their modules.
I do, but it involves reading what they've written instead of (for
example) just rgrepping for the current POD testing flavour of the month.
>
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 17:19:07 +0100, David Landgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chris Dolan wrote:
> > In the last year as a Fink maintainer (Mac OS X debian-like package
> > manager), I've come across a couple CPAN modules that have no license
> > information at all. It's very frustrating.
On Nov 2, 2005, at 12:13 PM, David Landgren wrote:
No. I'm complaining that there's no need for two different Kwalitee
points for this, that's all. I think one is sufficient (and a very
worthy one I should add, in case I wasn't being clear, which I
probably wasn't).
Ahh, that was unclear f
David Landgren wrote:
I am not going to use Module::Build. I've tried it but I prefer EU::MM,
at least for the time being. I'm all for the concept, but I wanted to do
something really basic with it for a new module a while ago. I forget
the details, but after futzing around for a while I just f
Chris Dolan wrote:
On Nov 2, 2005, at 10:19 AM, David Landgren wrote:
Chris Dolan wrote:
In the last year as a Fink maintainer (Mac OS X debian-like package
manager), I've come across a couple CPAN modules that have no
license information at all. It's very frustrating. I've submitted
On Wed, 2005-11-02 at 17:19 +0100, David Landgren wrote:
> I know that the current alpha of ExtUtils::MakeMaker supports this, but
> until it is released as stable *and* module authors have the time to
> upgrade EU::MM *and* release a new version of their module(s), those
> authors will be pena
On Nov 2, 2005, at 10:19 AM, David Landgren wrote:
Chris Dolan wrote:
In the last year as a Fink maintainer (Mac OS X debian-like
package manager), I've come across a couple CPAN modules that
have no license information at all. It's very frustrating. I've
submitted RT bugs, but one o
Chris Dolan wrote:
In the last year as a Fink maintainer (Mac OS X debian-like package
manager), I've come across a couple CPAN modules that have no license
information at all. It's very frustrating. I've submitted RT bugs,
but one of them has been fixed (thanks Ken Williams).
To encoura
Hi!
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 08:34:09AM -0600, Chris Dolan wrote:
> To encourage authors to correct this oversight, I propose a new pair
> of Kwalitee tests. Both would be nice, but if either of them were
> implemented, I'd be thrilled. I'd prefer that someone else implement
> the test (l
In the last year as a Fink maintainer (Mac OS X debian-like package
manager), I've come across a couple CPAN modules that have no license
information at all. It's very frustrating. I've submitted RT bugs,
but one of them has been fixed (thanks Ken Williams).
To encourage authors to correc
10 matches
Mail list logo
