Jonathan Rockway wrote:
> Anyway, should the DSLIP stuff be added to the META-spec? (I see that
> some stuff, like the S and L parts, are already covered by META.yml. Is
> the rest worth adding, or is it time to forget about it?)
Something like the DSLIP in purpose, but not exactly DSLIP. That
David Golden wrote:
> (Which reminds me to go update my module metadata on CPAN::Reporter
> since I've changed license and abstract since I first registered. The
> changes are in my META.yml, of course, but I forgot about PAUSE.)
>
This is a pretty good point and has caused me to change my min
On 9/26/07, David Golden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/26/07, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think (I hope) David was balking at the idea of encoding release
> > information
> > as CPAN forum tags and not so much at the idea of CPAN forum tags themselves
> > as independent
On 9/26/07, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think (I hope) David was balking at the idea of encoding release information
> as CPAN forum tags and not so much at the idea of CPAN forum tags themselves
> as independent search keywords.
The former.
David
Jonathan Rockway wrote:
> David Golden wrote:
>> On 9/25/07, Chris Dolan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Well, one option might be something like:
>>>http://www.cpanforum.com/tags/name/helpwanted
>>> Gabor, would it be easy to add an Atom/RSS feed for a particular tag?
>>>
>> Please n
On 9/26/07, Jonathan Rockway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Golden wrote:
> > Please no! Let's not spread module metadata around any more than we have
> > to.
> >
> > Extend META.yml to include the same kind of information that used to
> > be managed via the modules list. If someone wants to
