Re: TAPx::Parser 0.21

2006-09-11 Thread Michael G Schwern
Ovid wrote: - Original Message From: Chris Dolan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> How is that infinite stream different from the no_plan case? Is it truly infinite or just undetermined? That is, are you trying to code for the following use case? use Test::More test => 'Inf'; use LWP::Sim

Re: TAPx::Parser 0.21

2006-09-11 Thread Ovid
- Original Message From: Chris Dolan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > How is that infinite stream different from the no_plan case? Is it > truly infinite or just undetermined? That is, are you trying to code > for the following use case? > > use Test::More test => 'Inf'; > use LWP::Simple

Re: TAPx::Parser 0.21

2006-09-11 Thread Chris Dolan
On Sep 11, 2006, at 9:58 AM, Ovid wrote: - Original Message From: Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Ovid wrote: - Corrected the grammar to allow for a plan of "1..0" (infinite stream). 1..0 is currently used as part of the "skip all" syntax. 1..0 # skip B

Re: TAPx::Parser 0.21

2006-09-11 Thread Ovid
- Original Message From: Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Ovid wrote: > > - Corrected the grammar to allow for a plan of "1..0" (infinite > >stream). > > 1..0 is currently used as part of the "skip all" syntax. > > 1..0 # skip Because I said so > > Perhaps an i

Re: TAPx::Parser 0.21

2006-09-11 Thread Michael G Schwern
Ovid wrote: - Corrected the grammar to allow for a plan of "1..0" (infinite stream). 1..0 is currently used as part of the "skip all" syntax. 1..0 # skip Because I said so Perhaps an infinite stream is just "1.." ?