Re: git tarballs / tarfile comments

2008-09-02 Thread Eric Wilhelm
# from Jan Dubois # on Tuesday 02 September 2008 17:42: >On Tue, 02 Sep 2008, David Cantrell wrote: >> $ tar tzvf perl-ldap-0.37.tar.gz >> ?rw-rw-rw- root/root52 2008-08-28 12:52:15 pax_global_header >>unknown file type `g' >> drwxrwxr-x root/root 0 2008-08-28 12:52:15 perl-lda

Re: git tarballs / tarfile comments

2008-09-03 Thread Andreas J. Koenig
> On Tue, 2 Sep 2008 18:21:34 -0700, Eric Wilhelm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> a comment (a GIT commit id in this case). You need GNU tar 1.14 to >> handle the extended header correctly. Earlier versions will display >> a warning and extract the comment as a file. ew> Ah, interesting.

Re: git tarballs / tarfile comments

2008-09-03 Thread Andreas J. Koenig
> On Wed, 03 Sep 2008 05:55:19 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andreas J. Koenig) > said: > (I'll have a look what CPAN.pm can do about this ASAP.) CPAN 1.92_64 is uploaded with a workaround for broken tar implementations. Please upgrade: cpan> install ANDK/CPAN-1.92_64.tar.gz Bugreport

Re: git tarballs / tarfile comments

2008-09-03 Thread David Cantrell
On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 06:21:34PM -0700, Eric Wilhelm wrote: > # from Jan Dubois > >On Tue, 02 Sep 2008, David Cantrell wrote: > >> $ tar tzvf perl-ldap-0.37.tar.gz > >> ?rw-rw-rw- root/root52 2008-08-28 12:52:15 pax_global_header > >>unknown file type `g' > >It is not actually a file,

Re: git tarballs / tarfile comments

2008-09-03 Thread David Cantrell
On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 08:00:49AM +0200, Andreas J. Koenig wrote: > > [git comment in tarballs] > CPAN 1.92_64 is uploaded with a workaround for broken tar > implementations. Thanks, that appears to work. At least, it Does The Right Thing for perl-ldap-0.37. -- David Cantrell | A machine for t

Re: git tarballs / tarfile comments

2008-09-03 Thread David Golden
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 10:19 AM, David Cantrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 08:00:49AM +0200, Andreas J. Koenig wrote: >> > [git comment in tarballs] >> CPAN 1.92_64 is uploaded with a workaround for broken tar >> implementations. > > Thanks, that appears to work. At least

Re: git tarballs / tarfile comments

2008-09-03 Thread Graham Barr
On Sep 3, 2008, at 9:26 AM, David Golden wrote: On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 10:19 AM, David Cantrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 08:00:49AM +0200, Andreas J. Koenig wrote: [git comment in tarballs] CPAN 1.92_64 is uploaded with a workaround for broken tar implementations.

Re: git tarballs / tarfile comments

2008-09-03 Thread David Cantrell
On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 11:33:30AM -0500, Graham Barr wrote: > On Sep 3, 2008, at 9:26 AM, David Golden wrote: > > So do we count this as a win for CPAN Testers? ;-) > Sort of, due to the fact the bug did get fixed. > But the FAIL is record in the wrong place. It gets counted as a FAIL > in the

Re: git tarballs / tarfile comments

2008-09-03 Thread Eric Wilhelm
# from David Cantrell # on Wednesday 03 September 2008 06:14: >> Or, do thousands of people need to learn to do: >>   man git-tar-tree: >>          git tar-tree v1.4.0^{tree} git-1.4.0 | gzip >> >git-1.4.0.tar.gz Create a tarball for v1.4.0 release, but without a >> global extended pax header. > >

Re: git tarballs / tarfile comments

2008-09-03 Thread Aristotle Pagaltzis
* Graham Barr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-03 18:35]: > But the FAIL is record in the wrong place. Anyone with a CPAN toolchain older than the most recent bleeding edge version or with a couple-months-old tar binary (ie. everyone except a number of people indistinguishable from zero) will still en

Why make up a Makefile.PL (was: Re: git tarballs / tarfile comments)

2008-09-03 Thread David Golden
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Aristotle Pagaltzis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But the FAIL did fail to point out the true source of the > problem. And IMO this hints at a real problem that was mentioned > in this thread, but was not really indicted: namely CPAN.pm's > logic that if there is no M

Re: Why make up a Makefile.PL (was: Re: git tarballs / tarfile comments)

2008-09-03 Thread Aristotle Pagaltzis
* David Golden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-03 21:20]: > Examples: > > * BinTree > * Counter Can’t even find those. > * Apache::AuthenIMAP Last update: 2002. > Just to be on the safe side, however, earlier today I committed > a patch to the CPAN trunk to bypass CPAN::Reporter entirely if > a M

Re: Why make up a Makefile.PL (was: Re: git tarballs / tarfile comments)

2008-09-03 Thread David Golden
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Aristotle Pagaltzis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> * BinTree >> * Counter > > Can't even find those. > >> * Apache::AuthenIMAP > > Last update: 2002. They may not be indexed on search.cpan.org, but they exist in the02packages.details.txt.gz file and they exist in act

Re: Why make up a Makefile.PL (was: Re: git tarballs / tarfile comments)

2008-09-03 Thread Thomas Klausner
Hi! On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 03:16:35PM -0400, David Golden wrote: > There are handful of things on CPAN that are just zipped .pm files. I cpants says: cpants=> select extension,count(*) from dist group by extension ; extension | count ---+--- tar.gz| 14762 tgz | 241