In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Andrew M. Langmead"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So I'd think the best thing to do to make something that can produce answers
> to things like "what are the implementors of foo".
Ideally, there'd also be a comprehensive test suite to run after the
refactoring to
Now winging its way towards CPAN mirrors worldwide.
I've implemented it pretty much as described the other day.
Comments etc welcome.
K.
--
Kirrily 'Skud' Robert - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://infotrope.net/
"Sure, only 2 percent of the Internet population uses lynx, but they're
the top 2 perc
On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 11:04:48AM -0400, Andrew M. Langmead wrote:
> So I'd think the best thing to do to make something that can produce
> answers to things like "what are the implementors of foo".
Yes, the two most important things are:
Who are the implementors of methods/functions called
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 10:45:50AM +0200, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> That's it. And the refactoring browser just helps you with the
> mechanics of that.
>
> THAT'S SO EASY! If it works for them, it can work for us.
>
>
> So, I can handle the underlying mechanics no problem. Who's good at
> G
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 10:45:50AM +0200, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> 1) Change this() to that() in both 'Foo' and 'Bar', and change all
> instances of $obj->this to $obj->that.
>
> 2) Walk through each call to $obj->this and decide if it should
> be changed to $obj->that
I'm at, of all places, the Scandinavian conference on Java And
Object-Orientation (JAOO). Somebody stumbled upon the How To Be Lazy
tutorial and thought I knew something about design methodologies.
If nothing else it has the unique advantage of not being in New York.
So who do I meet here but Ma
