No directly, but it could be. The only place it exists as a single
thing is in the MySQL database that tester.cpan.org works from.
Graham.
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 03:27:56PM -0400, Adam Turoff wrote:
> Is the data used for testers.cpan.org available anywhere in one
> comprehensive chunk?
>
>
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 04:56:51PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 07:36:15PM +0200, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
> > > use Test::More no_plan;
> >
> > no bare words, please ;-)
> >
> > use Test::More qw(no_plan);
>
> I had started to add qw() to all my docs, but oddly
Any patches to modules from libnet, and test additions, should be
against the latest libnet on CPAN, I do not want the core to diverge.
So if a test depends on a module in the core it should check that
the module is avaliable, so that the test is skipped with older
perl releases.
Graham.
On Sat,
On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 02:14:43PM -0600, chromatic wrote:
> On Monday 22 October 2001 14:13, Graham Barr wrote:
>
> > > I understood that as Graham being unsure about using Test::More in the
> > > tests.
>
> > Actually I was refering to Mock::Socket
>
>
On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 04:27:51PM -0400, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 02:08:05PM -0600, chromatic wrote:
> > > > So if a test depends on a module in the core it should check that
> > > > the module is avaliable, so that the test is skipped with older
> > > > perl releases.
>
On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 04:10:06PM -0400, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 01:44:32PM +0100, Graham Barr wrote:
> > Any patches to modules from libnet, and test additions, should be
> > against the latest libnet on CPAN, I do not want the core to diverge.
>
On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 02:08:05PM -0600, chromatic wrote:
> On Monday 22 October 2001 14:10, Michael G Schwern wrote:
>
> > I can understand this. We should be patching the CPAN libnet.
>
> In progress.
>
> > > So if a test depends on a module in the core it should check that
> > > the module
On Sat, Mar 02, 2002 at 01:55:29PM +0100, Tels wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
> Moin,
>
> I Cc:ed [EMAIL PROTECTED], they are the "ones" ;) to decide this, if the
> authors are not responding.
>
> Although I wouldn't count on beeing lucky, since I am trying to
> "patch/takeover/m
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 03:26:36AM -0500, Mark-Jason Dominus wrote:
>
> > You probably already found out, but
> >
> > HP-UX 10.20 Has it defined as 003
> > HP-UX 11.00 Has it defined as 003
> > AIX 4.3.3.0 Has it defined as 3
> > AIX 4.2.1.0 Has it defined as 3
>
> Thanks for the inform
