Sisyphus wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Robert May"
.
.
A series of tests:
Drop - ok
DropF - fails
AropF - fails
DropFi- fails
DropFile - fails
DropFiles - fails
DropX - fails
DropFx- fails
DropFilesx- fails
xDropFiles
- Original Message -
From: "Robert May"
.
.
>
> A series of tests:
> Drop - ok
> DropF - fails
> AropF - fails
> DropFi- fails
> DropFile - fails
> DropFiles - fails
> DropX - fails
> DropFx- fails
> DropFilesx- fails
> xDropFi
Robert May wrote:
[possible bug with either mingw or DynaLoader under win98, narrowed down
to a mingw bug]
Now I just need to find out what the difference is between the 2 dll's.
MS's Dependency walker (Depends.exe, comes with the platform SDK)
loads both fine, and doesn't reveal anything ver
Sisyphus wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Robert May"
.
.
Steps to invoke problem:
(1) run: h2xs -A -n SomeModule
(2) cd into the created SomeModule directory
(3) run the incantation:
perl -MConfig_m Makefile.PL
nmake
nmake test
Generally this works fine, and t
- Original Message -
From: "Robert May"
.
.
> Steps to invoke problem:
> (1) run: h2xs -A -n SomeModule
> (2) cd into the created SomeModule directory
> (3) run the incantation:
> perl -MConfig_m Makefile.PL
> nmake
> nmake test
>
> Generally this works fine, and
I've run into an 'interesting' issue when building some of my own XS
extensions - I've narrowed the issue somewhat, but am about at the limit
of my knowledge (or possibly already beyond it). Can anyone else
duplicate the problem?
My setup:
Win98
Perl 5.8.7 Activestate build 813
MingW (gcc 2.3
